Cases: Prevailing Party

Prevailing Party: Residential Owners And Contractor, Each Winning On Their Dueling Contract Claims, Were Properly Found Not To Be The Prevailing Side

Cases: Prevailing Party

No Clear Winner And Mixed Results Sealed That Conclusion, With A Mechanical, Arithmetic Approach Not Being The Dispositive Calculus.             Residential owners, contractor, and subcontractors got into a brouhaha about the construction on a residential house, resulting in residential owners winning $160,000 on a contractual delay claim, contractor winning $535,000 on a contractual cross-claim for […]

Prevailing Party, Reasonableness Of Fees: Two Prevailing Party Fee Awards – Totaling $609,180 – To Plaintiff Assignee Attempting To Enforce Prior Judgment Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Original Judgment Creditor Had Satisfied Mediation Requirement In The Parties’ Fees Provision, And Defendants Failed To Raise Their Challenges To Specific Billing Entries Before The Trial Court Despite A Continuance To Allow Them To Do So.             Plaintiff buyer entered into a Purchase Agreement with defendant sellers for the purchase of sellers’ home.  The

Arbitration, Prevailing Party: $10,000 Attorney Fees Award To Prevailing Party On Motion To Vacate Arbitration Award Reversed On Appeal

Cases: Arbitration, Cases: Prevailing Party

The Parties’ Note Contained An Attorney Fees Provision, But Their Arbitration Agreement Did Not, And A Motion To Vacate An Arbitration Award Is Not An Action On A Note.             In Bilodeau v. Modern Mobile Homes, Case No. B302791 (2d Dist., Div. 6 March 29, 2021) (unpublished), plaintiff buyers entered into an agreement for

Costs, Prevailing Party: No Abuse Of Discretion In Trial Court’s Denial Of Prevailing Party Fees And Determination That There Was No Prevailing Party In Mixed Results Action

Cases: Costs, Cases: Prevailing Party

It Is Well Within The Trial Court’s Discretion To Make A Determination That Neither Party Prevailed Sufficiently To Justify An Award Of Attorney Fees.             In Ayala Boring v. HPS Mechanical, Case No. D076054 (4th Dist., Div. 1 March 19, 2021) (unpublished) – which resulted in two separate appeals – contractor defendant entered into a

Prevailing Party, Section 1717, Settlement: “Dismissal Pursuant To A Settlement Of The Case” Language In Civil Code Section 1717 Does Not Encompass Settlement With CCP § 664.6 Jurisdiction and Attorney’s Fees Clause Covering Post-Settlement Efforts

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717, Cases: Settlement

Appellant’s Construction Would Thwart Settlement Efforts.             Appellant in Wash v. Wash, Case No. F077486 (5th Dist. Mar. 11, 2021) (unpublished) earlier appealed an order enforcing a settlement agreement with a contractual fees clause, an appeal that he lost.  Respondent requested appellate fees of $18,216.98, with the trial judge awarding $9,321 against appellant.  Although the fee

Costs, Deeds of Trust, Prevailing Party, Section 1717, Seriously: 4/3 DCA Affirms Mixed Results Fee Awards To One Of Two Plaintiffs Of $34,740 And A Combination Of $35,577 To Two Of Three Defendants

Cases: Costs, Cases: Deeds of Trust, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717, Seriously

The Title Issue That Started It All Was Partly Corrected And Seller Resumed Payments Years Before, But The Parties Battled On All The Way To Trial – Incurring A Combined Total Of $202,299.50 In Fees, Plus Costs.             In our Mission Statement, we quote a statement made by Retired Justice Wallin in Deane Gardenhome

Appealability, Employment, Intervenors, Prevailing Party, Section 1717: Bevy Of Appealability Issues And Prevailing Party Issues Were Resolved By 4/1 DCA Dispute Between Former Employer And Employee Over Return And Use Of Documents On A Jump Drive

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Employment, Cases: Intervenors, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Employee Did Prevail On Employer’s Contract Claims, But Lower Court’s Reduced Fee Award For Prevailing On Labor Code Claims Was No Abuse Of Discretion—Given Attorney Intervenors Did Timely Appeal And Contest Merits Based On Their Attorney’s Lien Interest In Fees/Costs Awards.             This next case, Premier Mechanical Group, Inc. v. Harvey (Edwards), Case No. D075663

Prevailing Party: Litigant Successfully Opposing Attorney’s Fees Request Involving Pet Cemetery Dispute Properly Was Not Entitled To Fees As Prevailing Party

Cases: Prevailing Party

No Authority Provided To Show A Litigant Prevailed On Opposing A Fee Motion Where That Litigant Did Not Prevail On The Merits.             Allen v. MacIntosh, Case No. E073408 (4th Dist., Div. 2 Jan. 13, 2021) (unpublished) involved a trespass dispute on land which had a portion dedicated for use as a pet cemetery.  In

Prevailing Party, Receivers, Special Fee Shifting Statutes: City Of Norco v. Mugar Is Now A Published Decision.

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Receivers, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Trial Court’s Determination That Plaintiff City Was The Prevailing Party Was Proper Under Catalyst Theory, City’s Arrangement With Outside Counsel Did Not Violate Defendant’s Due Process Rights, And Fee Award Of $60,798.94 To City Was Not Meant To Penalize Defendant For Defending Property Rights.             We discussed City of Norco v. Mugar, Case No. E072858

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff Settling For $150,000 In FEHA/Residential Inhabitability Case For Costs Of Defense To Try The Matter, Was Properly Denied Attorney’s Fees

Cases: Prevailing Party

Plaintiff’s Request For $819,171.75 In Fees Was Inflated, With $150,000 Settlement Amount Being Much Lower Than The Damages Being Sought, Forget Demands In Mediation.             With 2020 drawing to a close, we can say there have been a surge in decisions on who is a prevailing party under Civil Code section 1717 where the results

Scroll to Top