Cases: Prevailing Party

Prevailing Party, Section 1717, Settlement: “Dismissal Pursuant To A Settlement Of The Case” Language In Civil Code Section 1717 Does Not Encompass Settlement With CCP § 664.6 Jurisdiction and Attorney’s Fees Clause Covering Post-Settlement Efforts

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717, Cases: Settlement

Appellant’s Construction Would Thwart Settlement Efforts.             Appellant in Wash v. Wash, Case No. F077486 (5th Dist. Mar. 11, 2021) (unpublished) earlier appealed an order enforcing a settlement agreement with a contractual fees clause, an appeal that he lost.  Respondent requested appellate fees of $18,216.98, with the trial judge awarding $9,321 against appellant.  Although the fee […]

Costs, Deeds of Trust, Prevailing Party, Section 1717, Seriously: 4/3 DCA Affirms Mixed Results Fee Awards To One Of Two Plaintiffs Of $34,740 And A Combination Of $35,577 To Two Of Three Defendants

Cases: Costs, Cases: Deeds of Trust, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717, Seriously

The Title Issue That Started It All Was Partly Corrected And Seller Resumed Payments Years Before, But The Parties Battled On All The Way To Trial – Incurring A Combined Total Of $202,299.50 In Fees, Plus Costs.             In our Mission Statement, we quote a statement made by Retired Justice Wallin in Deane Gardenhome

Appealability, Employment, Intervenors, Prevailing Party, Section 1717: Bevy Of Appealability Issues And Prevailing Party Issues Were Resolved By 4/1 DCA Dispute Between Former Employer And Employee Over Return And Use Of Documents On A Jump Drive

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Employment, Cases: Intervenors, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Employee Did Prevail On Employer’s Contract Claims, But Lower Court’s Reduced Fee Award For Prevailing On Labor Code Claims Was No Abuse Of Discretion—Given Attorney Intervenors Did Timely Appeal And Contest Merits Based On Their Attorney’s Lien Interest In Fees/Costs Awards.             This next case, Premier Mechanical Group, Inc. v. Harvey (Edwards), Case No. D075663

Prevailing Party: Litigant Successfully Opposing Attorney’s Fees Request Involving Pet Cemetery Dispute Properly Was Not Entitled To Fees As Prevailing Party

Cases: Prevailing Party

No Authority Provided To Show A Litigant Prevailed On Opposing A Fee Motion Where That Litigant Did Not Prevail On The Merits.             Allen v. MacIntosh, Case No. E073408 (4th Dist., Div. 2 Jan. 13, 2021) (unpublished) involved a trespass dispute on land which had a portion dedicated for use as a pet cemetery.  In

Prevailing Party, Receivers, Special Fee Shifting Statutes: City Of Norco v. Mugar Is Now A Published Decision.

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Receivers, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Trial Court’s Determination That Plaintiff City Was The Prevailing Party Was Proper Under Catalyst Theory, City’s Arrangement With Outside Counsel Did Not Violate Defendant’s Due Process Rights, And Fee Award Of $60,798.94 To City Was Not Meant To Penalize Defendant For Defending Property Rights.             We discussed City of Norco v. Mugar, Case No. E072858

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff Settling For $150,000 In FEHA/Residential Inhabitability Case For Costs Of Defense To Try The Matter, Was Properly Denied Attorney’s Fees

Cases: Prevailing Party

Plaintiff’s Request For $819,171.75 In Fees Was Inflated, With $150,000 Settlement Amount Being Much Lower Than The Damages Being Sought, Forget Demands In Mediation.             With 2020 drawing to a close, we can say there have been a surge in decisions on who is a prevailing party under Civil Code section 1717 where the results

Prevailing Party: Determination That No Side Prevailed Under Contentious Parking Easement Dispute Was Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Prevailing Party

Where One Side Wanted Exclusive Parking Easement And Other Side Wanted Termination Of Easement/Tort Damages, Trial Court’s Decision To Share Parking Was A True “Lose-Lose” Case For Everyone.             One of our leading cases, Hsu v. Abbara, 9 Cal.4th 863 (1995), is must reading and the blueprint for the decision to affirm a trial court’s

Landlord/Tenant, Prevailing Party, Section 1717: Reversal Of $172,375 In Attorney Fees Awarded To Defendant Based On Trial Court’s Abuse Of Discretion In Finding Defendant Was The Prevailing Party

Cases: Landlord/Tenant, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Pursuant To Section 1717, Defendant Was Not The Prevailing Party As It Lost The Sole Cause Of Action In The Case – With The Jury Awarding $45,050 In Damages To Plaintiff For Defendant’s Breach Of The Written Lease Contract.             Waterwood Enterprises, LLC v. City of Long Beach, Case No. B296830 (2d Dist., Div. 1

Prevailing Party, Receivers, Special Fee Shifting Statutes: $60,798.94 Awarded To Prevailing City In Abatement Nuisance Action Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Receivers, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

City’s Arrangement With Outside Counsel Did Not Violate Defendant Property Owner’s Due Process Rights, Fee Award Was Not Meant To Penalize Defendant For Defending Property Rights, And Trial Court Properly Determined City The Prevailing Party Under Catalyst Theory.             Plaintiff City and defendant property owner had a long history of conflict regarding substandard conditions on

Prevailing Party, Section 1717: 2/5 DCA Affirms Trial Court’s Award Of $225,000 § 1717 Prevailing Party Attorney Fees Plus $55,000 In Appellate Attorney Fees To Defendant Succeeding On Equitable Causes Of Action

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Although Plaintiff Prevailed On The Unlawful Detainer Claim, Defendant Obtained Greater Relief, And The Parties’ Contract Fees Provision Encompassed Both Contract And Tort Causes Of Action.             We previously discussed a prior appeal from this next case, which stemmed from a landlord/tenant dispute over the use of six parking spaces, in our May 23,

Scroll to Top