Cases: Section 1717

Allocation, Prevailing Party, Section 1717: $99,071.65 Fee Award To Defendant Sued In A Third Amended Complaint Affirmed On Appeal Based On 5-Year Granted Motion

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Civil Code Section 1717 Justified The Award; No Apportionment Was Warranted Among Claims; And Lower Court Did Not Error In Calculating Fee Recovery From Date The Other Side Began Work On The FAC. In Jones v. Eaton, Case No. B342733 (2d Dist. Div. 5 Nov. 2, 2026) (unpublished), plaintiff named and sued individual defendant in

Appealability, Prevailing Party, Section 1717:  Although Defendants’ Appeal Of An Order Denying Attorney’s Fees After A Voluntary Dismissal Was Accepted, The Request For Prevailing Party Fees Was Premature

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

That Was The Case Because Plaintiff And Defendants Were Still In Arbitration. This next case had a little bit of everything: appealability, prevailing party, Civil Code section 1717, and prematurity issues. In BRHE Group v. Bates, Case No. G065703 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Oct. 15, 2026) (unpublished), plaintiff sued defendants under a business purchase contract

Nonsignatories, Reasonableness Of Fees, Section 1717: $313,830 Contractual Fee Award Under Medical Center’s By-Laws Affirmed On Appeal Against Plaintiff Physician

Cases: Nonsignatories, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Section 1717

Section 1717 Was Not Preempted By Business And Professions Code Section 809.1, With Plaintiff’s Wife Not Liable For Fees And With Reductions In Fees Sustained On Appeal. A plethora of fee issues were addressed in Sujan v. UHS Corona, Inc., Case No. E084185 (4th Dist., Div. 2 Sept. 16, 2026) (published) after the lower and appellate courts

Allocation, Section 1717: Where Trial Court Ordered Apportionment, Which Prevailing Parties Could Not Accomplish, 27% Of Requested Fee Award Was The Result

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Section 1717

Prevailing Parties’ Counsel Passed, But The Lower Court Gave An Opportunity To Allocate—They Could Not, But It Is The Fee Claimants’ Burden Of Proof. The result in Choy v. Ribeiro Development, Inc., Case No. C100831 (3d Dist. Sept. 1, 2026) (unpublished) may at first blush seem harsh, but it is a fee claimant’s burden to justify

Section 1717: Contractual Attorney’s Fees To Defendant Where Plaintiff Wanted To Dismiss Entire Action After An Adverse Demurrer Ruling On One Claim Was Reversed On Appeal

Cases: Section 1717

Lower Court Erred By Not Entering The Entire Dismissal, Which Triggered The Santisas Bar For An Award Of Civil Code Section 1717 Fees. In Shayan v. Shakib, Case No. B337559 (2d Dist., Div. 1 Aug. 27, 2026) (unpublished), plaintiff sued defendant under various loan transactions having promissory notes with prevailing party, contractual fee clauses.  After some

Landlord/Tenant, Nonsignatories, Section 1717: Out Of Two Defendants Claiming To Be Prevailing Parties Under A Contractual Lease Clause, Neither Was Entitled To Fees

Cases: Landlord/Tenant, Cases: Nonsignatories, Cases: Section 1717

One Defendant Was Found To Forfeit All Rights Under The Lease On Summary Adjudication, And The Other Was Not A Lease Signatory.  In Morales v. Wang, Case No. B346779 (2d Dist., Div. 2 Aug. 12, 2026) (unpublished), after plaintiffs accepted a defense CCP § 998 offer which was silent on attorney’s fees, plaintiffs moved for

Landlord/Tenant, Mediation, Section 1717: $69,560 Fee Award To Tenant For Defensing An Unlawful Detainer Suit Based On A Defective Notice To Cure Or Quit Is Affirmed

Cases: Landlord/Tenant, Cases: Mediation, Cases: Section 1717

Mediation Noncompliance And Fee Cap Arguments Are Rejected On Appeal. In Karrass v. Carey, Case No. B344608 (2d Dist., Div. 8 July 30, 2026) (unpublished), tenant defensed a landlord in an unlawful detainer action based on an alleged notice to cure violations or quit, a notice found deficient.  Later, the trial court awarded tenant prevailing

Fee Clause Interpretation, Partition, Section 1717: Denial Of 1717 Fees Reversed; Grant Of Partition Fees Reversed But Without Prejudice To Renew In The Future

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Partition, Cases: Section 1717

Gives A Potential Litigant Over A Jointly Inherited House A Chance To Obtain Some Trial And Appellate Fees In The Future. Tran v. Tran, Case No. H052186 (6th Dist. July 28, 2026) (unpublished) involved a real dispute between two siblings jointly inheriting a house from their father.  As many cases devolve to, the main clash

Prevailing Party, Section 1717: District Prevailing In Percentage Lease Dispute Under Contractual Leases Was Properly Awarded $137,400 In Attorney’s Fees

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Contractual Ambiguity Challenges Did Not Resonate, Because Not Raised Below. In Ventura Harbor Restaurant Associates, Inc. v. Ventura Port Dist., Case No. B344145 (2d Dist., Div. 6 July 9, 2026) (certified for publication, after being filed on June 15, 2026 as an unpublished opinion), the appellate court affirmed a $137,400 contractual attorney’s fees award under

Scroll to Top