Author name: Marc Alexander

Probate:  Appellate Court Reverses Award Of Attorney’s Fees To Resigning Co-Trustee Sister In Dysfunctional Fight With Co-Trustee Brother

Cases: Probate

Reviewing Court Felt That Sister Also Breached Her Fiduciary Duties And Did Not Get All She Wanted, So It Was An Abuse Of Discretion To Award Her Fees Out Of Trust Property.             In what the parties themselves and the appellate court described as a dysfunctional relationship between a brother and sister who were at […]

Costs/Prevailing Party: Parsons Was Prevailing Party In Qui Tam Action So As To Be Entitled To Routine And Expert Witness Costs Awardable Against MTA

Cases: Costs, Cases: Prevailing Party

Prior Settlement Agreement Between Parties Did Not Preclude Later Costs Award.             In L.A. County MTA v. Parsons-Dillingham Metro Rail, Case No. B265863 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Feb. 26, 2018) (unpublished), Parsons was the prevailing party under a false claims count in a qui tam action.  Earlier, Parsons and MTA had reached a settlement agreement

Probate/Record: Lack Of Transcript On Probate Objection To Award Of Ordinary Fees Dooms Appeal By Objecting Party.

Cases: Probate, Cases: Record

Probate Fee Order Presumed Correct.             A probate court in Estate of Marshall, Case No. A150296 (1st Dist., Div. 2 Feb. 27, 2018) (unpublished) awarded an attorney $7,500 in ordinary attorney’s fees to a former attorney for an estate.  An objection was filed stating that the fee should be shared with a court-appointed administrator, which

Trade Secrets:  $338,288.78 Attorney’s Fees Award Under California’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act Reversed And Remanded

Cases: Trade Secrets

Reason Was That The Trial Judge Based Bad Faith Finding On Determination Which Did Not Fully Encompass The Trade Secret Cause Of Action Relating To The Adversely Impacted Cross-Complainant             This is part of a continuing trade secret litigation saga, an attorney’s fees proceeding aftermath to a case we posted on in 2016, Dispatch &

Equity:  Ninth Circuit Certifies Accounting/Clawback Issues Between Law Partners On Post-Departure Legal Matters Taken By Departing Partner

Cases: Equity

Three Questions Are Certified To The D.C. Court Of Appeals.             In our July 30, 2016 and September 15, 2016 posts, we informed our readers that the Ninth Circuit had certified certain accounting/clawback issues relating to what happens to post-depature legal work continued by departing partners after a law firm has dissolved, issues occurring in

Arbitration/Section 1717:  Attorney’s Fees Incurred In Disqualification Motion And Other Associated Motions Before Arbitrator And Trial Court Properly Were Awarded To The Defense

Cases: Arbitration, Cases: Section 1717

Defense Did Prevail Because Arbitration Was Dismissed For Failure To Prosecute After Plaintiffs Failed To Pay Arbitration Fees.             Fiscal Funding Co., Inc. v. Dones, Case No. A146377 (1st Dist., Div. 3 Feb. 27, 2018) (unpublished) was quite an arbitration battle in which the Claimants lost a motion to disqualify their attorney as well as

Costs:  Clerk’s Premature Entry Of Costs Award Stricken As A Matter Of Law

Cases: Costs

Procedural Requirements Did Guide This Result.             In Fichter v. Byrd, Case No. B270418 (2d Dist., Div. 4 Feb. 27, 2018) (unpublished), the appellate court, as a matter of law, decided to strike a $729.11 costs award to prevailing plaintiffs through a clerk’s entry on plaintiffs’ judgment.  The reason?  Costs were awarded before the time

Private Attorney General: Plaintiff’s Successful Injunction Against Public Agency Contract Bidding Process Did Not Justify CCP § 1021.5 Fee Recovery Plaintiff, Although Successful, Had Too Much Financial Incentive In Obtaining The Expensive Contract

Cases: Private Attorney General (CCP 1021.5)

Plaintiff, Although Successful, Had Too Much Financial Incentive In Obtaining The Expensive Contract Job Or In Obtaining A Re-Bid Of The Project.             In West Coast Air Conditioning Co., Inc. v. Cal. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Case No. D071611 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Feb. 22, 2018) (unpublished), plaintiff wanted to obtain the bid of

Prevailing Party:  Trial Judge’s Decision That City Prevailed For Fee Purposes Was Sustained On Appeal

Cases: Prevailing Party

City Won Less Than 4% Of Pled Damages Against Guarantor And Only 22% Of Past Due Amounts Claimed At Trial, Garnering $100,152 In Fees Under Guaranty Fees Clause.             City of Dinuba v. Thusu, Case No. F073781 (5th Dist. Feb. 20, 2018) (unpublished) demonstrates how deferential the “prevailing party” status determination can be under Civil

Private Attorney General:  Reversal Of Plaintiffs’ Mandate Petition Means Trial Judge Then Has To Entertain Motion For Section 1021.5 Fees

Cases: Private Attorney General (CCP 1021.5)

Trial Judge, Rather Than Appellate Court, In Best Position To Determine Upon Full Record.             In Save LaFayette v. City of LaFayette, Case No. A149342 (1st Dist., Div. 4 Feb. 21, 2018) (published), the appellate court reversed a denial of appellants’ mandate petition requesting the City to submit their referendum to a public vote.  In

Scroll to Top