Author name: Marc Alexander

SLAPP:  Order Denying Plaintiff’s Request For Fees After Defeating SLAPP Motion Is An Interlocutory, Nonappealabe Order

Cases: SLAPP

2/7 DCA Followed Its Earlier Conclusion in Doe v. Luster, Departing Opposite Conclusion By 4/3 And 2/3 DCA Panels.             Defendant lost a SLAPP motion, but the trial court refused to award plaintiff attorney’s fees because it did not believe the motion to be frivolous.  Both sides appealed in Hirschfield v. Cohen, Case No. B267706 […]

Family Law Post:  Family Code Section 271 Sanctions Can Be Deducted From The Variable Component Of A Spousal Support Order

Cases: Family Law

Spousal Support Is Income For Purposes Of Interpreting Section 271.             In Marriage of Pearson, Case No. D070360 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Mar. 12, 2018 partially published; fee discussion published; other parts of opinion modified Mar. 27, 2018), the 4/1 DCA decided that a trial judge did not err in ordering that Family Code section

Assignment, Deed Of Trust, Fee Clause Interpretation:  Defendant Lender Entitled To Fee Award Under Deed Of Trust Fees Clause For Winning Conversion Claim Against Plaintiff’s Assignee

Cases: Assignment, Cases: Deeds of Trust, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

Fees Clause Was Broad Enough To Encompass Conversion Claim And Assignees Were “On The Hook.”             In Sanchez v. El Monte Investments, LLC, Case No. B276423 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Mar. 27, 2018) (unpublished), former property owner sued her lender for conversion of certain insurance proceeds retained by the lender after fire damage to the

Homeowner Associations:  $707,117 Fee Award To HOA Goes Away Upon Reversal Of HOA’s Victory In Judgment Notwithstanding The Verdict Ruling On Plaintiff Homeowners’ Nuisance  Claim

Cases: Homeowner Associations

Further Fee Proceeding Remand Occurs In Decade-Spanning Litigation.             Cathedral Hill Tower Condominium Assn. v. Garbar, Case No. A144036 (1st Dist., Div. 3 Mar. 27, 2018) (unpublished) was the latest appeal by homeowners against HOA in a decade-spanning action involving claims for nuisance, negligence, and breach of contract by HOA.  A jury found in homeowners’

Sanctions:  CCP § 128.7 And Family Code Section 271 Sanctions Improperly Imposed Against Attorney

Cases: Sanctions

$5,000 Sanctions Award Against Attorney Reversed.             Attorney and client her were sanctioned for $5,000 under CCP § 128.7 and Family Code § 271 in Saidiner v. Jacobs-Jakubowicz, Case No. B275860 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Mar. 26, 2018) (unpublished).  Attorney appealed the sanctions award, which was reversed on appeal. The CCP § 128.7 sanctions could

Costs, Fee Clause Interpretation, Section 1717:  Successful Attorneys On Contract Claim Properly Granted Fees; Successful Plaintiff On Tort Claims Properly Denied Fees; And Plaintiff Improperly Denied Costs As Prevailing Party With Net Judgment In Malpra

Cases: Costs, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Section 1717

Many Cross-Over Fees And Costs Issues Considered By Appellate Court In This One.             In Davidson v. Southwick, Case No. E066978 (4th Dist., Div. 2 Mar. 26, 2018) (unpublished), plaintiff client successfully won a malpractice action based on various torts but lost a contract claim against certain attorney parties, winning a compensatory jury verdict of

Costs/Discovery:  Expenses For Activities Associated With Production Of Electronically Stored Documents Properly Awarded As Discretionary Costs Under CCP § 1033.5(c)

Cases: Costs, Cases: Discovery

$150,449.49 Was Costs Award To The Successful Defendant.             Litigators at both the federal and state levels are fully aware of the expense which has been added to litigation based on having to produce electronically documents/information in cases (also known as “ESI”).  The next opinion demonstrates that ESI expenses can be recouped by a successful

SLAPP:  $16,396 SLAPP Fee Award To Prevailing Defendant Was No Abuse Of Discretion

Cases: SLAPP

Lower Negotiated Hourly Rate Helped Salt Reasonableness Of Fee Award.             In Montoya v. Belk, Case No. D072275 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Mar. 23, 2018) (unpublished), defendant won a SLAPP motion and then sought $20,108 in mandatory “reasonable” fees, with the trial judge awarding $16,396 instead.   On appeal, plaintiffs challenged this as an abuse of

Intellectual Property:  Zazzle Dodges Plaintiff’s Request For Attorney’s Fees After It Lost Copyright Infringement Dispute Over Paintings

Cases: Intellectual Property

$715,833.25 Base Lodestar Request By Plaintiff Was At Issue Where $351,100 Compensatory Award And Permanent Injunction Were The Result In The Case.             In Greg Young Publishers, Inc. v. Zazzle Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-04587-SVW (KSx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2018), U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson denied a request by plaintiff for an award of

Costs/Intellectual Property:  Ninth Circuit, In 2-1 Opinion, Affirms Denial Of Costs To Successful Defendants/Counterclaimants And Apportionment Of Costs Between Two Sides In Well-Publicized Case Involving Copyright Infringement Dispute

Cases: Costs, Cases: Intellectual Property

Dispute Involved Pharrell Williams’ “Blurred Lines” And Marvin Gaye’s “Got To Give It Up.”             The Ninth Circuit in Williams v. Gaye, Case Nos. 15-56880 et al. (9th Cir. Mar. 21, 2018) (published) faced having to resolve an appeal of the case by which Pharrell Williams’ 2013 song “Blurred Lines” was found to have infringed

Scroll to Top