In The News

In The News . . . . Self-Defense Insurance Available For Criminal/Civil Cases Involving Guns, Costa Mesa Has Spent Over $457,000 On Marijuana Dispensary Lawsuits, And Napa County Judge Denies $1.3 Million Private Attorney General Fee Request In A Water La

In The News

  USCCA Has Gun Self-Defense Insurance.      Since the right to bear arms has seemingly gotten more constitutional/political oomph lately, we saw an interesting report that United Stated Concealed Carry Association (USCCA), an organization devoted to armed citizens who have decided to conceal and carry guns, has created a unique concealed carry insurance-backed membership benefit. […]

In The News . . . . California State Senate Approves Bill To Pay $13 Million In Settlement And Court-Ordered Fees In Legal Disputes By State

In The News

  $1 Million of Proposed Appropriation Are Court-Ordered Fees to Winner in Violent Video Game Litigation.      As reported in a January 31, 2012 post in The Sacramento Bee, the California State Assembly has approved Senate Bill 730, which in turn proposes payment of $13 million in settlements and court-ordered attorney’s fees in legal disputes

In The News . . . . MGA/Mattel Bratz Doll Litigation Keeps On Giving

In The News

  Evanston Insurance Co./Markel Corp. Lose Two Summary Judgment Motions in January 27, 2012 Pair of Rulings.      In this on-going litigation saga, Evanston Insurance Company and its parent corporation, Markel Corp. lost summary judgment motions on insurance coverage issues relating to their potential responsibility to MGA Entertainment Inc. in the case it won against

In The News . . . . Texas Contingency Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Garner Close To $22 Million Fee Award After Plaintiffs Unsuccessfully Challenge Contingency Arrangement

In The News

  Plaintiffs’ Contingency Arrangement Was Valid and They Breached It.      Here is an interesting one from a January 30, 2012 post in the Texas Lawyer.      Thee Dallas firms — Lisal Blue of Baron and Blue; Charla G. Aldous of the Aldous Law Firm; and Stephen F. Malouf of the Law Offices of Stephen

In The News/Retainer Agreements: ABA Journal Summarizes Results of Recent American Lawyer Report On Alternative Fee Arrangements

Cases: Retainer Agreements, In The News

  They Are Catching On, Along With Client Requests for Discounts.      Co-contributor Mike, who is a member of the American Bar Association, found an interesting article by Debra Cassens Weiss dated January 17, 2012 in the ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter, where she summarized a recent American Lawyer report on alternative fee arrangements this way:

Civil Rights/In The News . . . . Civil Rights Plaintiff Winning $500 Entitled To Fee Award Of $80,000

Cases: Civil Rights, In The News

  U.S. Magistrate Judge’s Recommendations Has Some Nice “Fees on Fees” Hints.      In a January 13, 2012 post of the Courthouse News Service, we are informed that U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein accepted U.S. Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann’s recommendation that a civil rights plaintiff should be awarded $80,000 in attorney’s fees for prevailing

Retainer Agreements/In The News . . . . New York Voids Retainer Agreement Terms Discouraging Clients From Following An Exiting Attorney

Cases: Liens for Attorney Fees, Cases: Retainer Agreements, In The News

  Attorney Lien “Penalty” Provision Also Invalidated.      As reported by both the American Bar Association Journal and Buffalo News in January 10, 2012 posts, New York Supreme Court Justice John A. Michalek voided two provisions in a retainer agreement apparently designed to encourage clients from following an exiting attorney to another legal firm. The

In The News . . . . Federal Circuit Affirms $4.7 Million Fee/Expert Costs Award Against Losing Patent Infringement Litigant

In The News

  Case Deemed Exceptional for Fee Award and Expert Fees/Costs Were Within Inherent Sanctioning Power of District Court.      In MarcTec LLC v. Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corp., Case No. 2010-1285 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 3, 2012), the Federal Circuit affirmed a Sourthern District of Illinois district judge’s rulings by which a $3,873,865.01 attorney’s fees

Scroll to Top