Cases: Prevailing Party

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff Obtaining Some Scaled Back Damages And Declaratory Relief On Environmental Contamination Properly Awarded $1.345 Million In Fees

Cases: Prevailing Party

Although Not Winning Everything, Plaintiff Did Obtain Significant Declaratory Relief So As To Be Deemed The Prevailing Party.             In Hot Rods, LLC v. Northrop Grumman Corp., Case No. G054432 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Dec. 5, 2018) (unpublished), the case involved environmental contamination of a property in Anaheim that was sold by defendant to certain […]

Intellectual Property, Preemption, Prevailing Party: Defendants’ Prevailing On Preemption Claim Under State Statute With Mandatory Fees Clause Was Entitled To Appellate Fees For The Win

Cases: Intellectual Property, Cases: Preemption, Cases: Prevailing Party

Even Though A Few Sliver Claims Remained, Defendants Prevailed Because Those Claims Are Not Subject To Fee Shifting.             The Ninth Circuit, in an earlier appeal, had decided that plaintiffs’ claims for resale royalties under the California Resale Royalties Act (CRRA) largely were preempted by the 1976 Copyright Act for any claims occurring after January

Arbitration, Prevailing Party: Party Defeating Petition To Compel Arbitration, The Only Contractual Claim, Was Entitled To Fee Recovery Despite No Completed Arbitration On The Noncontract Claims

Cases: Arbitration, Cases: Prevailing Party

Finality Was Present With Respect To The One Contractual Issue, Justifying Civil Code Section 1717 Recovery.             In an earlier published decision, general contractor was found to have waived the right to compel arbitration in construction defect and mechanic’s lien cases which ultimately were consolidated. The winning party on the arbitrability dispute, the only contractual

Prevailing Party, Special Fee Shifting Statute: State False Claims Act Fee-Shifting Statute Applies To Defendant Prevailing On Just The False Claim Act Claims Rather Than The Action As A Whole

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

This Result Fosters Deterring Actions Without Foundation Brought By Government Against Private Entities/Persons.            The First District, Division 5, in John Russo Industrial Sheetmetal, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles Dept. of Airports, Case No. A151729 (1st Dist., Div. 5 Nov. 26, 2018) (published), dealt with a situation where a plaintiff contracted with the L.A.

Prevailing Party: Where Alter Ego Allegations Only Directed At Tort Claims With Narrow Fees Clause, Individual Cross-Defendant Beating Alter Ego Claims On Tort Claims Not Entitled To Fee Recovery

Cases: Prevailing Party

Narrow Fees Clause and Tort Claims Were The Determining Factors Here.             In Echeverria v. Cohen, Case No. B285085 (2d Dist., Div. 8 Nov. 26, 2018) (unpublished), plaintiff dental corporation sued defendant landlord over a commercial lease termination, and defendant cross-claimed against the tenant and tenant’s principal under an alter ego theory. Landlord prevailed on

Deeds Of Trust, Prevailing Party, Section 1717: Where Lender Did Get Ruling Saying Plaintiff Had To Repay Loan, That Was A Prevailing Party Determination

Cases: Deeds of Trust, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Section 1717 Governed In This One, Given Broad Fees Clause In Deed Of Trust.             In PNG Investments, Inc. v. RG Real Estate Investments, Case No. B280229 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Nov. 20, 2018) (unpublished), plaintiff/cross-defendant won a real estate loan dispute against defendant/cross-complainant. Later, the trial judge awarded plaintiff/cross-defendant contractual attorney’s fees under a

Celebrities, Prevailing Party: Plaintiff Model/Actor Winning $1.123 Million In Unauthorized Likeness Case Was Improperly Denied Prevailing Party Fees Under Civil Code Section 3344

Cases: Celebrities, Cases: Prevailing Party

Despite Plaintiff Not Winning Multi-Millions More Being Claimed, Appellate Court Believed He Should Get Prevailing Party Fees.             Co-contributor Mike was a little surprised by this one, given how prevailing party determinations in mixed cases are usually governed by a deferential abuse of discretion standard. However, that often depends on the facts of the case,

Prevailing Party, Probate, Section 1717: 1/1 DCA Affirms “No Prevailing Party” Determination In Hotly Contested Probate Promissory Note Dispute Between Two Siblings

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Probate, Cases: Section 1717

Although Trial Court Lacked Jurisdiction Over The Dispute In California, Fee Denials On Dueling Motions Was Justified Because Siblings Had To Await Determination In Texas Action.             In Savage v. Savage, Case No. A150984 (1st Dist., Div. 1 Oct. 15, 2018) (unpublished) [parenthetically, maybe a good case name for court disputes – no?], two siblings

Prevailing Party, Section 1717: Trial Court Properly Denied Section 1717 Fees To Plaintiff Winning $338,750 And To Cross-Complainant Winning $32,960

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Neither Side Obtained Complete Success, With Both Suffering Significant Defeats In The Overall Litigation.             Both sides in 12400 Stowe Drive, LP v. Cycle Express, LLC, Case No. D069738 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Sept. 28, 2018) (unpublished) were unhappy that the trial judge found neither to be the “prevailing party” based on a lease fees

Prevailing Party, Special Fee Shifting Statute: San Benito Water District Regulation Fee-Shifting Provision Supported $82,762 Fee Award After Water District Obtained An Injunction Against Water Customer Such That Delinquent Account Was Paid

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Myriad of Arguments, Including Prevailing Party Determination, Were Rejected On Appeal.             This one shows how a delinquent water bill for $25,000 can mushroom into additional fee exposure of $82,762 when there is a local fee-shifting ordinance under which a local water district prevails.             What occurred in San Benito County Water Dist. v. McAlpine,

Scroll to Top