Compensatory Award Was $560,709; 1.5 Fee Multiplier Also Justified. In the FEHA civil rights area, the law is intentionally designed to confer reasonable attorney’s fees upon winning civil rights plaintiffs and only impose fees against them should the case be shown as frivolous/baseless in nature. The next case illustrates how substantial fee awards
Big Chunk of Settlement Went to Attorney’s Fees for Winning Plaintiff. As reported by Tony Saavedra in an article in the January 26, 2012 Orange County Register, Orange County has paid $375,000 to end a federal lawsuit alleging that sheriff’s deputies arrested the wrong man, ordered him to strip naked, and beat him
“Inflated” Fee Request Justified Outright Denial By Trial Court. Plaintiff won $6,359.10 on a FEHA claim, plus $168 for missed lunch breaks. Then, this litigant sought to recover fees of $717,828.50 under FEHA for “prevailing” in the trial court. Get outta here, said the appellate court more eloquently than we in Romero
U.S. Magistrate Judge’s Recommendations Has Some Nice “Fees on Fees” Hints. In a January 13, 2012 post of the Courthouse News Service, we are informed that U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein accepted U.S. Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann’s recommendation that a civil rights plaintiff should be awarded $80,000 in attorney’s fees for prevailing
Wrapping It Up: M & M’s Top 25 Attorney’s Fees Decisions For 2011 Part 1 of 2 It is that time of year, at year end, for us to list our top published attorney’s fees decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and California Courts of Appeal. Although we normally
$305,000 Fee Award Sustained For Violation Even Though No Damages Awarded. Anderson v. AG Seal Beach, Case No. B228683 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Dec. 14, 2011) (unpublished) is a case where a successor won a $171,000 jury verdict for her mother’s alleged skilled nursing home injuries, even though the jury did not enter
Lower Court Properly Scaled Back Expert Fee Costs Award Against Plaintiff Based on Her Financial Situation. Hernandez v. The Regents of the University of California, Case Nos. A129427/A130063 (1st Dist., Div. 4 Dec. 12, 2011) (unpublished) involved some interesting fees and costs issues, especially given the shifting impact of Code of Civil Procedure
60% Reduction by Trial Court Dispatched Inefficiency/Padding/Overcharge Challenges. In Fuentes v. Autozone, Inc., Case No. B224034 (2d Dist., Div. 4 Nov. 16, 2011) (certified for partial publication; fee discussion unpublished), plaintiff won a $160,000 FEHA damages award, with the lower court subsequently awarding attorney’s fees of $677,025 under the fee-shifting statute. In doing
In Pro Per Restrictions Do Not Apply to Representation by One’s Spouse. A plaintiff prevailed on a civil rights claim and then sought recovery for work done by her attorney spouse and a co-counsel non-spouse. The district judge awarded plaintiff fees charged by co-counsel in the amount of $13,770 (out of a requested
She Lost Elder Abuse Claim by Plaintiff and Did Not Prevail on Her Frivolous FEHA Sexual Harassment Cross-claim. Bad facts can result in large jury verdicts; they also tend to guide the dispositon of the trial judge when it comes to awarding attorney’s fees against the non-prevailing litigant. That is what happened in
