Cases: Appeal Sanctions

Appeal Sanctions: Unsuccessful Patent Infringement Plaintiff, Losing Summary Judgment Motion Badly, And Its Counsel Are Jointly And Severally Assessed With Frivolous Appeal Sanctions Of $107,748.27

Cases: Appeal Sanctions

This Was A 2-1 Opinion, With A Reduction For Sanctions Motion “Fees On Fees”; Dissent Felt That Just A Weak Appeal Did Not Warrant Sanctions.             Under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 38, a circuit court may award “just damages and single or double costs to the appellee” if an appeal is determined to be […]

Appeal Sanctions, Sanctions, Settlement: No Abuse Of Discretion In Trial Court’s Order Sanctioning Plaintiffs $10,000 For Failure To Execute Settlement Agreement

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Sanctions, Cases: Settlement

The Record Reflected That The Parties Agreed In Open Court To Put The Oral Settlement Agreement In Writing And That Deadlines For Payment Of Settlement Funds Would Be Triggered By Full Execution Of The Written Settlement Agreement.             In Tricoast Builders v. Frederick, Case No. B307825 (2d Dist., Div. 6 October 18, 2021) (unpublished), homeowner

Appeal Sanctions, Discovery, Sanctions: Fifth District Denies Defendants’ Writ Petition Challenging The Trial Court’s Order To Produce Discovery Responses And Pay $13,680 In Sanctions.

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Discovery, Cases: Sanctions

Defendants’ Filing Of The Writ Petition Was Wholly Without Merit And, Under The Standards Set Forth In Flaherty, Was Frivolous And Filed Solely To Cause Delay – Warranting $6,965.00 In Sanctions Pursuant To California Rules of Court, Rule 8.492.             After defendants failed to provide discovery responses for over three years, the trial court granted

Appeal Sanctions, Costs: 2/4 DCA Denies Requests From Prevailing Party In A Writ Proceeding For Attorney Fees To Be Included As Part Of Costs Award And For An Award Of Fees As A Sanction Against Defeated Party

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Costs

Attorney Fees Are Not Included As Recoverable Costs Under California Rules Of Court, Rules 8.493(b) And 8.278(d), And A Passing Reference To An Award Of Fees As Sanctions, With No Showing Of Justification For Sanctions, Does Not Qualify As A Motion For Sanctions Under Rule 8.492(a).             In Harden v. Superior Court, Case No. B311738

Appeal Sanctions, Judgment Enforcement, Tort Of Another: Judgment Creditor Denied Contractual, Statutory, Or Tort Fees Where Thrust Of Dispute Involved Claim Under A Separate Contract Not Involving Judgment Debtors And Having No Contractual Fees Clause

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Judgment Enforcement, Cases: Tort of Another

Attorney Was Not A Party To The Judgment Collection Settlement Agreement And Defenses Asserted In An Answer Do Not Provide A Tort Of Another Damages Predicate; Appellate Sanctions Request Denied.              Bush v. Cardinale, Case No. A159689 (1st Dist., Div. 4 Aug. 13, 2021) (unpublished) was a situation where a judgment creditor reaching judgments against

Appealability, Appeal Sanctions, Discovery, Sanctions: $4,900 In Monetary Discovery Sanctions Affirmed

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Appealability, Cases: Discovery, Cases: Sanctions

However, Frivolous Appeal Sanctions Denied For Failure To Show The Appeal Was Brought For An Improper Motive.             In Lazo v. Keller, Case No. G058765 (4th Dist., Div. 3 July 29, 2021) (unpublished), two plaintiffs separately were ordered by the lower court to pay $4,900 in monetary discovery sanctions to defendant.  Plaintiffs’ appeal was dismissed

Appeal Sanctions, Probate: 4/1 DCA Grants Brothers’ Request For $25,087.91 In Appeal Sanctions Against Sisters And Orders Sisters To Pay Additional $8,500 Sanction To The Clerk Of The Court

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Probate

Sisters Were Previously Found To Be “Vexatious Litigants” Under Code Civ. Proc. § 391(b), Forfeited Claims On Appeal By Failing To Raise Them In The Trial Court And Failing To Follow Appellate Procedures, And Sought To Relitigate Claims Previously Decided By The Appellate Panel.             Family members were involved in disputes over their deceased mother’s

Appeal Sanctions, Special Fee Shifting Statutes: Plaintiff Obtaining Restraining Order Against Neighbor And Successfully Defeating Neighbor’s Appeals Was Denied Her §527.6(s) Request For Trial And Appellate Fees, And For Appeal Sanctions

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Plaintiff Did Not Appeal Trial Court’s Fees Denial, Failed To Provide Appellate Panel With Support Or Argument For §527.6(s) Award For Fees Incurred On Appeal, And Neighbor’s Meritless Appeals Did Not Rise To The Level Of Frivolity So As To Warrant Sanctions.             After granting plaintiff’s request for a temporary and later permanent restraining order

Appeal Sanctions: Plaintiff Escapes Sanctions For Filing A Frivolous Appeal Of Judgment Entered In Defendant’s Favor After Having Filed Three Previous Unsuccessful Lawsuits Against Same Defendant Alleging Violation Of The Same Primary Right

Cases: Appeal Sanctions

Although No Sanctions Were Imposed, The 2/6 DCA Did Not Mince Words In Warning Plaintiff That Further Attempts To Litigate The Same Subject Matter Will Result In Sanctions.             Plaintiff filed four lawsuits against defendant seeking to vindicate her primary right to ownership interest in her home which had been foreclosed upon and sold at

Appeal Sanctions, Private Attorney General: 4/1 DCA Denies Requests For Appeal Sanctions And Private Attorney General Fees To Derivative Action Plaintiffs That Were Successful In Proving Former President/CEO’s Breach Of Fiduciary Duty

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Private Attorney General (CCP 1021.5)

Although Unsuccessful, Former President/CEO’s Arguments On Appeal Were Not Objectively Without Merit So As To Rise To The Level Of Frivolity Justifying Sanctions, And Plaintiffs Forfeited Their Claim To § 1021.5 Private Attorney General Fees By Not Making It Before The Trial Court.             In A&B Market Plus, Inc. v. Arabo, Case No. D073850

Scroll to Top