Author name: Marc Alexander

Insurance: Appellate Court Determines That Brandt Recovery Does Entail Routine Litigation Defenses In Addition To Attorney’s Fees

Cases: Insurance

Analysis Of Other Cases So Confirmed.             In Vallejo v. Fire Ins. Exchange, Case No. C091547 (3d Dist. Nov. 21, 2022) (unpublished), the Court of Appeal faced a narrow issue:  under Brandt v. Superior Court, 37 Cal.3d 813 (1985), does an insurer receive routine litigation expenses as a recovery in addition to attorney’s fees to […]

Prevailing Party, Reasonableness Of Fees, Section 1717: $200,000 Fee Award To Prevailing Defendant Affirmed Because Tort Claims Allowed For Recovery, Post-Dismissal, Under Santisas

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Section 1717

Settlement With Other Parties Did Not Impact Analysis Of Fee Reasonableness As To The Prevailing Defendant.             Carp Property, LLC v. Corona, Case No. B316354 (2d Dist., Div. 6 Nov. 17, 2022) (unpublished) was a situation where plaintiff litigated a matter for two years where there was a contractual fees clause in an operative agreement,

Multipliers: Dicta In Unpublished Case Implies That Fee Agreement With “Incurred” Language Did Not Prevent A Multiplier

Cases: Multipliers

Appellate Decision Suggested That San Dieguito Partnership Decision Was Undermined By PLCM Group.             Because appellant really failed to support challenges to a fee decision, dicta in Counts v. Chadwick, Case No. A163282 (1st Dist., Div. 1 Nov. 15, 2022) (unpublished) has more importance for practitioners in fee proceedings.  Specifically, appellant claimed that an award

Costs: $240,170 Out Of $322,812 In Costs Awarded In Personal Injury Action Against Defendant Were Improperly Awarded

Cases: Costs

Costs For Non-Expert Treating Physicians And Exhibit Work By Law Firm Regularly Salaried Employee Were Not Proper Subjects Of An Award.             Plaintiff husband (and his wife to some extent) were awarded over $3.7 million in a vehicular personal injury action against defendant, with the lower court later awarding plaintiff $322,812 in costs (out of

Costs, Judgment Enforcement: CourtCall and Electronic Filing Fees Are Discretionary Costs Which Can Be Awarded

Cases: Costs, Cases: Judgment Enforcement

Appellant’s Claim For An Offset Based On An Appellate Costs Award Was Rejected Because Appellant Failed To Renew His Judgment Before The 10-Year Deadline Ran.             In Henry v. Dawson, Case No. G061115 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Nov. 15, 2022) (unpublished), the 4/3 DCA affirmed that CourtCall and electronic filing expenses are allowable in the

Family Law, Sanctions: $73,000 Fee Award, $220,952 Expert Fee Award, And $200,000 Sanctions Award Under Family Code Section 2107(c) Were Not Erroneous

Cases: Family Law, Cases: Sanctions

Statutory Provision Allows For These Awards Where An Ex-Spouse/Ex-Partner Fails To Satisfy His/Her Disclosure Violations In A Dissolution Proceeding.             Family Code section 2107(c) allows a family law judge to award fees, costs, and sanctions for disclosure violations during a dissolution proceeding, with certain disclosure obligations triggered by the service of the divorce action.  In

Deadlines, Probate: $212,089.25 In Fees To Sole Trust Beneficiary Under Probate Code Section 8804(c) Was Sustained Under Law Of The Case Doctrine

Cases: Deadlines, Cases: Probate

Also, Fee Motion Was Timely Filed Based On Notice of Entry of Judgment Containing Two Documents Comprising The Judgment.             In Karamooz v. Karamooz, Case No. G060515 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Nov. 14, 2022) (unpublished), authored by Justice Moore, sole trust beneficiary earlier had obtained a $212,089.25 attorney’s fees award under Probate Code section 8804(c),

Family Law, Sanctions: Husband’s Dismissal of Joinder Complaint Involving Wife’s Brother Did Not Divest Lower Court Of Jurisdiction To Impose Sanctions Against Brother And In Favor Of Husband For Frivolous Motion Under Family Code Section 271

Cases: Family Law, Cases: Sanctions

$58,400 In Sanctions Were Imposed.             In In re Marriage of Blake & Langer, Case No. B311966 (2d Dist., Div. 4 Nov. 10, 2022) (published), husband filed a joinder complaint against wife’s brother and wife’s father in wife’s dissolution action.  Wife’s brother filed a frivolous motion to disqualify husband’s attorneys.  Husband filed a Family Code

Intellectual Property: Ninth Circuit Affirms $508,709.20 Fee Award And $5,856.27 Costs Award To Plaintiff In A Copyright Case

Cases: Intellectual Property

Even Though Plaintiff Only Obtained Compensatory Damages, As Remitted Twice, Of $116,975.23.             The Copyright Act has a discretionary fee-shifting statute, giving considerable discretion to district judges in making or denying an award of fees.  To show how the fees and costs award can be much more than a compensatory damages award, we refer you

Reasonableness Of Fees: Plaintiffs Denied Contractual Fees Altogether Did Not Adequately Address All Reasons For Denial In Their Appellants’ Opening Brief

Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Responding To Some More Of The Defense Arguments In The Reply Brief Was Too Late.             In GI Excellence, Inc. v. Padda, Case No. E076843 (4th Dist., Div. 2 Nov. 7, 2022) (unpublished), plaintiffs won around $65,000 in compensatory damages and then moved to recover $755,300 in contractual attorney’s fees.  The lower court denied the

Scroll to Top