In The News

In The News . . . . Tri-City Healthcare District Hit With SLAPP Fee Award; Lehman Bros. Bankruptcy Fees Mount Up; Capistrano Unified School District’s Appeal Of IDEA Fee Award Sustained; And City Of Fontana Hit With Fees In Civil Rights Case After F

In The News

  Tri-City Healthcare District Ordered to Pay $29,000 in Fees for Partially Successful SLAPP Motion by Director Kathleen Sterling.      As reported by Nathan Scharn in a December 23, 2011 post at SignOnSanDiego.com, Tri-City Healthcare District has been ordered to pay $29,000 to director Kathleen Sterling for her partially successful SLAPP motion against claims in […]

In The News . . . . Wisconsin Enacts Fee Caps Legislation; PA Supreme Court Decides Multipliers Are Not Allowable In Magnuson-Moss Cases; And Delaware Chancery Court Approves Third Highest Shareholder Fee Award

In The News

  Wisconsin Passes into Law Presumptive Three Times Fee Cap.      Effective December 20, 2011, Wisconsin recently enacted legislation requiring judges to award attorney’s fees no more than 3 times damages in many cases. (2011 Wisconsin Act 92.) Although this cap establishes a presumptively reasonable fee award, a court can award a greater amount after

In The News . . . . Loser Pay/Capped Damages Update, In-House Lawyers Balking At Paying For Novice Lawyer Use, Best Cities For First Year Attorney Buying Power, And Impact of Court Budget Cuts

In The News

       Co-contributor Mike’s relative Tom Basehart has loaded us up with some more year-of-the-end articles having some interesting discussions on attorney’s fees, lawyer compensation, and impact of state court budget cuts. So, we share some of the highlights with you now. Tort Reform: Losers Pay, Capped Damages, and Other Reform Updates.      As reported

In The News: Indio Olive Farmers Avoid Private Attorney General Fee Exposure; Sgt. Sarver Hit With SLAPP Fees Of $187,000 Against Hurt Locker Film Participants; Milwaukee Lawyer Derides Lemon Law Fee Capping Amendment; And Minnesota Lawyer Faces Possible

In The News

  Indio Olive Farmers Sidestep Fee Award in Hot-Air Balloonist Dispute.      As reported in a December 8, 2011 post by The Indio Sun, Indio olive farm owners do not have to pay more than $330,000 in attorney’s fees to hot-air balloonists they fought for two years based on the claims that the balloonists flew

In The News/Class Action/Civil Rights: Gulf Oil Spill Class Action Steering Committee Request Garners Controversy And Civil Rights Attorney Awarded $1.50 (Actually, $1.40) Despite Winning Prisoner’s Civil Rights Case

In The News

  Gulf Oil Spill Class Action Request Stirs Up Some Emotions on Both Sides.      As reported by John Schwartz in a December 3, 2011 article in The New York Times, attorney members of the Deepwater Horizon (Gulf) oil spill class action multidistrict litigation against BP have requested a New Orleans federal district judge to

In The News . . . . San Diego Superior Court State Judge Denies Without Prejudice A $756,132 Fee Request To Winner In San Diego Fireworks Permitting Dispute

In The News

  Fee Request Was Ruled To Be Premature In Nature.      In a follow-up to our post of October 25, 2011, San Diego Superior Court Judge Linda Quinn denied a requested $756,132 in attorney’s fees under California’s private attorney statute by attorney Mario Gonzalez for winning a case challenging San Diego’s fireworks permitting process. She

Class Actions/In The News: Prof. Fitzpatrick, At A Recent Washington, D.C. Panel Seminar, Contends That Class Action Lawyers Get “A Bad Rap” On Fee Awards

Cases: Class Actions, In The News

  He Has Empirical Evidence to Support His Position.      In Washington, D.C., there was an interesting recent panel discussion at the National Lawyers Convention of the Federalist Society, discussing whether attorney’s fees in class actions are too low, too high, or just right. Some panelists cited class action abuses, but an unlikely panelist for

In The News . . . . Eastern District of Pennsylvania Federal Court Awards $6.5 Million In Fees And Costs In Favor Of Defense In Exceptional Patent Infringement Litigation

In The News

  Even Fees/Costs Spent On Lost Claims Were Recoverable.      35 U.S.C. § 285 does allow district judges discretion to award attorney’s fees and costs in a patent infringement case that is “exceptional,” which usually means a determination that the litigation was brought and/or prosecuted in bad faith. This provision was used to award a

Scroll to Top