Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Reasonableness Of Fees: Trial Court Did Not Abuse Its Discretion In Denying Plaintiff Creditor His Requested Fees Where Debtor Invalidated A “Penalty” Structured Settlement

Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Creditor Properly Recovered Only $2,500 Out Of A Requested $15,730 In Fees Against Debtor.             In Murphy v. Combat Sports Academy, LLC, Case No. A153937 (1st Dist., Div. 5 May 24, 2019) (unpublished), a plaintiff creditor structured a settlement with defendant debtor by which a stipulated judgment would be entered for $150,000 from a “true” […]

Allocation, Section 1717, Reasonableness Of Fees: 4/3 DCA Affirms Contractual Fee Award To Prevailing Asserted Alter Ego Defendants To The Tune Of $203,940

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Section 1717

No Apportionment Required Because Alter Ego Claims Were Involved On Both Causes Of Action; Assertion That Hourly Rates Should Be Lower Did Not Rebut Fee Claimant’s Attorney’s Declaration.             In Alvarado v. Freedman, Case No. G055918 (4th Dist., Div. 3 March 28, 2019) (unpublished), plaintiff sued defendants for loan repayment, based on a loan agreement

Allocation, Reasonableness Of Fees: Trial Court Properly Awarded 20% Of Fees Requested By Two Prevailing Plaintiffs In Wage Hour Dispute Where They Had Limited Success

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Plaintiffs Recovered $8,500; Sought Fees Of $171,000; Were Awarded Fees Of $37,250.             Lack of success in a case can certainly impact fee recovery to prevailing parties, as Almaguer v. Newland Entities, Inc., Case No. C075662 (3d Dist. March 27, 2019) (unpublished), demonstrates.             There, two plaintiffs partially prevailed on certain labor/wrongful termination claims, but

Assignment, Prevailing Party, Reasonableness of Fees: No Abuse Of Discretion In Awarding Prevailing Defendant $92,155 After Reasonableness Reduction.

Cases: Assignment, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

It Was Not Necessary For Court To Apportion Fees Between Contract-Based Causes Of Action, Claims Dismissed Before Trial, Defense of Defendant Corporation, and Defense of Corporation’s CEO Because Plaintiff’s Causes Of Action All Stemmed From A Common Factual Core, And All Claims Against CEO Were Also Alleged Against Entity.         In Grant v. AssistMed, Inc.,

Private Attorney General, Reasonableness Of Fees: Trial Judge’s Reduction Of Requested Appellate Fees From $630,000 To $140,000 Was No Abuse Of Discretion, Except For 40% Reduction Based On Calculating In Attorney’s Interest In Financial Recovery

Cases: Private Attorney General (CCP 1021.5), Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Hourly Rates Were Too High For Sacramento Venue, Laffey Matrix Could Be Used, And Hours Property Reduced For Inflated Request.            In Limon v. Dept. of Finance, Case No. C082501 (3d Dist. Feb. 11, 2019) (unpublished), as it often times does, the likely final fight involved the award of appellate fees to prevailing plaintiffs in

Reasonableness Of Fees, Section 1717: $1,047,313.72 Contractual Fee Recovery To Defendants Was Not Excessive In Long-Running Litigation

Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Section 1717

Civil Code Section 1717 Has No “Obligation-To-Pay” Requirement.             Defendants in Legendary Investors Group v. Niemann, Case No. B284736 (2d Dist., Div. 4 Jan. 16, 2019) (unpublished) prevailed in a long-running suit against plaintiff involving commercial loan and guaranty documents. Defendants, as prevailing parties, requested fees of $1,061,208.22, with the lower court awarding $1,047,313.72. Plaintiff

Civil Rights, Reasonableness Of Fees: Trial Judge Properly Awarded Fees Of $710,000 To A Somewhat Successful Plaintiff In A FEHA Case, Rejecting Inflated Fee Request Of Over $2.7 Million

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Compensatory Award Was $307,762, Even Though Jury Was Asked To Award $7 Million.             Inflated fee requests, as we know from the oft-quoted decision in Christian Research Institute v. Alnor, 165 Cal.App.4th 1315, 1325-1326 (2008), are a special situation which allows a trial judge to substantially reduce or deny altogether the request. Alnor was front

Consumer Statutes, Costs, Reasonableness Of Fees: 4/2 DCA Reverses Fee Award Under Song-Beverly Act Where Trial Judge Seemed To Base Award On Proportionality Of Fees To Modest Damages Award

Cases: Consumer Statutes, Cases: Costs, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Also, Denial Of Trial Transcript Expenses Reversed Because They Were Compensable Under Song-Beverly Act Costs/Fee-Shifting Provision.             Although occurring in the civil rights context, we foresaw in our December 20, 2015 post on Kerkeles v. City of San Jose, 243 Cal.App.4th 88, 102-104 (2015) that it would have much more significance in other substantive areas.

Homeowner Associations, Mediation, Reasonableness Of Fees: $225,000 Fee Recovery In Favor Of HOA And Against Losing Condo Owner Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Homeowner Associations, Cases: Mediation, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Mediation Requirement Did Not Apply To HOA-Owner Dispute, Owner Failed To Specifically Identify Objections Fees, And Lower Court Did Award Substantially Reduced Fees From The HOA’s Requests.             We have done many posts showing how HOAs or owners can be subject to substantial fee exposure for losing HOA-owner disputes. Seahaus La Jolla Owners Assn. v.

Discovery, Reasonableness Of Fees: 6 DCA Remands Determination For Prevailing Party Under Subpoena To Look Again At Amount Of Fees To Be Awarded

Cases: Discovery, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

CCP § 1987.2 Prevailing Party Fees In Subpoena Context Might Depend On Who Met Litigation Objectives, Although The Test Is Not Crystal Clear.             John/Jane Roe v. Halbig, Case No. H043248 (6th Dist. Nov. 20, 2018) (published) is an interesting, but somewhat perplexing, opinion on the fees to be awarded to a party which ultimately

Scroll to Top