Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

Fee Clause Interpretation: Plaintiff Purchaser Obtaining Specific Performance In A Real Estate Transaction Properly Awarded Fees Under A Contractual Fees Provision Against Losing Seller

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

Closing Costs Provision Was Distinct From Litigation Prevailing Party Provision.             The next case, Classic Auto Repair, Inc. v. Ida, Case No. B308002 (2d Dist., Div. 8 Mar. 8, 2023) (unpublished) is a real estate primer on contractual interpretation on allocation of attorney’s fees exposure with respect to litigation and closing costs.  The plaintiff purchaser

Fee Clause Interpretation, Homeowner Associations, Reasonableness Of Fees: $132,070.40 Fee Award To Defendant Homeowners Was Affirmed On Appeal As Against Plaintiff Homeowners In Tree Obstruction Dispute

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Homeowner Associations, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Plaintiffs Pled CC&Rs As A Basis For Nuisance Claim, So There Was Fee Entitlement Under Civil Code Section 1717, CCP Section 1021, And Civil Code Section 5975, With The Fee Award Being Reasonable After A Minor Haircut By The Trial Judge.             Plaintiff homeowners sued neighboring homeowners in a tree obstruction action based on nuisance

Fee Clause Interpretation: “Arising Out Of” Contractual Fee Clause Language Was Broad Enough To Allow A Prevailing Party On A Related Statutory Claim To Obtain Fee Recovery

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

Trial Court Denied Fee Motion, So It Was Remanded For A Rehearing To Fix Reasonable Fees.             “Arising out of” language in a contractual fees clause can indeed give rise to fee exposure even where a prevailing party succeeded on a related statutory claim rather than a contract qua contract claim.  Varney Entertainment Group, Inc.

Fee Clause Interpretation, Section 1717: Second District Reverses Fee Awards Totaling $680,104.12 As A Matter Of Law

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Section 1717

One Award Reversed Because It Only Covered An Arbitration/Ensuing Litigation Even Though No Arbitration Occurred, And Other Award Overturned Because It Was Unclear That Fiduciary Breach Claim Was Not Barred By Santisas.             San Jose Nihonmachi, LLC v. Miraido Corp., Case No. B323093 (2d Dist., Div. 1 Jan. 4, 2023) (unpublished) shows how the absence

Arbitration, Fee Clause Interpretation: $1,648,620.17 Contractual Fee Award By An Arbitration Award Against FeeDx Affirmed In A Ninth Circuit Opinion

Cases: Arbitration, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

Arbitration Tribunal’s Fee Award Was Not Completely Irrational In Nature Under The FAA.             In HayDay Farms, Inc. v. FeeDx Holdings, Inc., Case Nos. 21-55650/21-55698 (9th Cir. Dec. 19, 2022) (published), two parties (HayDay and FeeDx) entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with each other through Nippon, providing for arbitration and making Nippon liable for

Fee Clause Interpretation, Lodestar: $547,465.10 Fee Award And $23,589.25 Costs Award To Prevailing Defendant Sellers Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Lodestar

Liability Cap Did Not Apply To Fees, Out-Of-County Attorneys Showed Good Cause To Represent Defendants In Tuolumne County, And Trial Judge Reduced Fee Request By 20%.             In Apartment Rental Assistance II, Inc. v. 80 Oak Hills, L.P., Case No. F083238 (5th Dist. Dec. 13, 2022) (unpublished), buyer plaintiffs lost a summary judgment to seller

Fee Clause Interpretation, Mediation: Fee Clause Allowing Only Prevailing Party Attorney’s Fees For Mediation Or Arbitration Proceedings Enforced As Written

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Mediation

Fees Clause Did Not Allow For Recovery Of Fees In Litigation.             In Glass v. Whills, LLC, Case Nos. B304806 et al. (2d Dist., Div. 4 Aug. 10, 2022) (unpublished), both the trial and appellate court were dealing with a civil litigant’s claim for prevailing party attorney’s fees recovery under a fees clause providing that

Deeds Of Trust, Fee Clause Interpretation: Borrower Losing Wrongful Foreclosure Action Was Properly Assessed With Contractual Attorney’s Fees Under the Note To The Tune Of $878,067.11

Cases: Deeds of Trust, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

“Security First”/Antideficiency Arguments Did Not Prevail Because Contractual Fee Exposure For Wrongful Foreclosure Claims Were Independent Contractual Obligations.             This next appeal is a somewhat related appeal to our independent July 26, 2022 post regarding sanctions awarded against plaintiff borrower’s attorney for violation of trial preparation rules.  In Shiheiber v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Case

Fee Clause Interpretation: Denial Of Attorney’s Fees Was Reversed Because Debt Extension Agreement Was Inextricably Interrelated With Loan Agreement Containing A Fees Clause

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

Looking Only At The Debt Extension Agreement Was Too Myopic In Nature.             In Cable v. O’Neill, Case No. D079096 (4th Dist., Div. 1 July 7, 2022) (unpublished), debtor defaulted under a loan agreement containing a contractual fees clause.  Creditor and debtor then entered into a debt extension agreement not having a fees clause, but

Allocation, Fee Clause Interpretation: Plaintiff Owner Losing A Variety Of Intertwined Claims Arising From A Home Improvement Contract Was Properly Assessed With Contractual Party Fees As Against The Home Improvement Installer

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

Installer Was Awarded $1,223 In Costs And $95,531.68 In Attorney’s Fees.             Plaintiff owner sued a home installer on various contractual, tort, and statutory theories for a job of under $4,000, with there being a home improvement contract with a fees clause covering performance issues under the contract.  Owner lost across the board, with the

Scroll to Top