Cases: Costs

Costs, Special Fee Shifting Statutes: In “Close Call” Situation, 9th Cir. Majority Affirms Denial Of EAJA And Bad Faith Atty’s Fees Where Government Lost Case Due To Unreliable Opinion Of Its Expert, But Reverses Denial Of Certain Deposition Costs

Cases: Costs, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Dissenting Circuit Judge Would Have Awarded Defendants Fees Because DOL’s Case Was Not Substantially Justified When Viewed Under An Objective Standard.             The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) was enacted to curb abusive and costly lawsuits involving the federal government, authorizing a prevailing party to seek attorney’s fees and costs from a federal agency […]

Civil Rights, Costs: Prevailing ADA Defendant Entitled To Costs Under F.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1) Even If The Matter Was Not Frivolous

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Costs

Majority Opinion Followed Marx Decision; Dissent Would Have Followed A Contrary Pre-Marx Decision Despite Indicating The Result Might Be The Same.             In Garcia v. Gateway Hotel, L.P., Case No. 21-55926 (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 2023) (published), the Ninth Circuit, in a 2-1 opinion, clarified that defendants prevailing in an American with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Costs, Default Judgments, Multipliers, Paralegal Time: $709,620 In Attorney’s Fees Entered As Part Of A Default Judgment After Entry of Terminating Sanctions Was Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Costs, Cases: Default Judgments, Cases: Multipliers, Cases: Paralegal Time

Complaint Did Not Have To Plead An Exact Amount Of Fees; 3.0 Positive Multiplier Appropriate; PAGA Settlement Administration Expenses/Paralegal and Legal Assistant Expenses Properly Allowed As Routine Costs.             Haaverson v. Tavistock Freebirds, LLC, Case No. A164043 (1st Dist., Div. 5 Aug. 18, 2023) (unpublished) is an interesting opinion which explores whether a complaint needs

Costs: Plaintiff’s Failure To Renew A Tax Costs Motion Taken Off Calendar Resulted In A Modified Judgment Years Later With The Costs Added

Cases: Costs

Plaintiff Did Not Subsequently Renew His Objections At The Trial Level, Meaning The Addition Of Costs Was A Ministerial Act Rather Than A Substantial Amendment to the Judgment.             Max v. Shih, Case No. B322716 (2d Dist., Div. 1 July 27, 2023) (unpublished) is a situation which reminds counsel to renew motions to strike costs,

Costs, Private Attorney General: In Case Involving Extension Of 241 Toll Road Near San Clemente, 4/2 DCA Affirms Denial Of 1021.5 Fees To HOA, Reverses And Remands Denial Of Fees To Environmental Parties, And Affirms Award Of Costs Against HOA

Cases: Costs, Cases: Private Attorney General (CCP 1021.5)

Lots Of Moving Parts Here, But The Remand For Environmental Parties Is Not An Automatic Endorsement Of Receiving 1021.5 Fees.             City of San Clemente v. Department of Transportation et al., Case No. E077153 (4th Dist., Div. 2 June 29, 2023) (published) arose out of the Corridor Agency’s approved extension of State Route 241 (known

Appeal Sanctions, Costs: Prevailing Party Was Entitled To An Amended Judgment With Costs Requests Included Because The Other Side Did Not File Any Motion To Strike/Tax Costs

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Costs

However, Appeal Sanctions Were Denied Because They Were Improperly Sought In Respondent’s Brief, Rather Than Through A Separate Motion.             The next case, Black v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., Case No. A165731 (1st Dist., Div. 1 May 11, 2023) (unpublished), has two lessons, where a prevailing party did obtain an amended judgment to add unopposed

Costs: Prevailing Party On Appeal Allowed $1,500 In Printing/Copying Appellate Costs For Appellate Briefs/Other Pleadings

Cases: Costs

Counsel Press Expenses Were Allowed, With Unsuccessful Motions Still Entitled To Allowance.             In Kleidman v. Feeva Technology, Inc., Case No. H049681 (6th Dist. May 10, 2023) (unpublished), the losing party challenged $1,500 in appellate costs for printing and copying briefs, arguing that it included motion and other pleadings (not just briefs) and that it

Costs: Computerized Legal Research Costs Are Not Allowable As Routine Costs, But Electronic Hosting Expenses, Even If Not Ordered By The Trial Court, Are Discretionarily Reimbursable

Cases: Costs

1/4 DCA Follows Ladas On The Computerized Legal Research Issue.              Kung v. Carthy, Case No. A161965 (1st Dist., Div. 4 May 3, 2023) (unpublished) considered whether computerized legal research costs and electronic hosting expenses (expenses not expressly approved by the trial judge) are reimbursable.  Number 1 was decided to not be a reimbursable cost,

Costs, Prevailing Party: Party Achieving Partial Success, And Reversal Of Prior Fee Prevailing Party Adverse Against It, Was Not Entitled To Fees On Remand Because Lower Court Properly Determined It Did Not Prevail

Cases: Costs, Cases: Prevailing Party

The Appellate Win Did Not Allow For Prevailing Party Fees, Because The Ultimate Litigation Outcome Result Was Dispositive—No One Prevailed.             The next case, Waterwood Enterprises, LLC v. City of Long Beach, Case No. B316269 (2d Dist., Div. 1 Apr. 26, 2023) (unpublished) had a topsy-turvy procedural history, but it at long last has seemed

Costs: Defendant’s Failure To File A Verified Memorandum Of Costs, After Being Given Extra Time By The Court, Precluded Recovery Of Costs

Cases: Costs

Lower Court Also Granted Plaintiff CCP § 473 Relief From A Late-Filed Motion To Tax Costs, But No Costs Could Be Recovered Given Plaintiff’s Waiver By Failing To File A Costs Memo.             The procedural events in Cielo Homeowners Assn. v. Bennett, Case No. D079743 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Mar. 10, 2023) (unpublished) were, to

Scroll to Top