Cases: Costs

Costs, Experts, Insurance, Section 998: Trial Court Properly Awarded Costs, Including Almost $70,000 In Expert Witness Fees, To Successful Defendant After Plaintiff’s Rejection Of Defendant’s Section 998 Offer

Cases: Costs, Cases: Experts, Cases: Insurance, Cases: Section 998

Plaintiff May Have Been Overreaching When He Followed Defendant’s $15,001 Offer With His Own $299,995 Offer Given Jury’s Return Of Defense Verdict.             Grayfer v. Wawanesa General Ins. Co., Case No. B285554 (2d Dist., Div. 7 November 18, 2019) (unpublished) provides a cautionary tale about the risk involved in overreaching and rejecting reasonable section […]

Costs, Special Fee Shifting Statute: Venue Transfer Order—Under Penalty Of Dismissal—Ran From Service Of Minute Order, With Plaintiff’s Noncompliance Leading To A Reversal

Cases: Costs, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Failure To Dismiss Case Lead To A Real Reversal Of Fortune!            In Southwestern Law School v. Benson, Case No. BV032895 (L.A. County Superior Ct. App. Div. Oct. 25, 2019, posted Nov. 14, 2019) (published), a very narrow issue was presented on appeal, with dire consequences for the plaintiff.  The issue was whether a plaintiff

Costs: Prevailing Defendant Did Not Have To Raise Winning Arguments Earlier In The Litigation, Through A Demurrer, In Order To Recoup Routine Costs

Cases: Costs

CCP § 1033.5 Has No Optimal Efficiency Requirement, Only That The Costs Were “Reasonably Necessary” To The Litigation.             The losing plaintiff on a summary judgment motion contested an award of routine costs in Harris v. VII Pier Pointe Owner, LLC, Case No. B280729 (2d Dist., Div. 4 Oct. 14, 2019) (unpublished).  Plaintiff’s argument was

Costs, Experts, Section 998: Sixth District Affirms Denial Of $26,950.50 In Expert Witness Fees To Prevailing Defendant Because Section 998 Offer Was Not Apportioned Among Plaintiffs

Cases: Costs, Cases: Experts, Cases: Section 998

Defendant’s Treatment Of Mother And Son Plaintiffs As Spouses For Section 998 Purposes Did Not Fly.             In Roe v. Hollister School Dist., Case No. H043658 (6th Dist., Sept. 26, 2019) (unpublished), mother and son plaintiffs (Jane and Jonnie Roe) sued school district and others for an incident involving the five-year-old son and another six-year-old

Costs: Awarded Costs Of $199,464.98, Consisting Mostly Of Deposition Costs Incurred In Related Federal Proceeding, Upheld On Appeal Because Coordination Order Was At Play And Apportionment Among Actions Not Necessary

Cases: Costs

The Coordination Order Called For Extensive Discovery Coordination Among The Federal And State Court Actions Such That Costs Incurred For Depositions Noticed In The Federal Proceeding Were Incurred In The California Proceeding. 1921 Model T Ford             In In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I and II, Case No. A152893 (1st Dist., Div. 4 Sept.

Costs, Deadlines, Reasonableness Of Fees, SLAPP: 2/3 DCA Affirms SLAPP Fee Award To Defendant Of $53,915.50, The Full Defense Request, Rejecting Untimely Motion Filing Argument

Cases: Costs, Cases: Deadlines, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: SLAPP

However, Costs Award Reversed Because It Was Untimely Filed And Prejudiced Plaintiff.             In Residual Income Opportunities, Inc. v. Cynergy Data, LLC, Case No. B289219 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Aug. 29, 2019) (unpublished), the defense won a SLAPP motion, filing for recovery of costs to the tune of $3,567.77 and moving for attorney’s fees totaling

Costs, Deadlines: Costs Memorandum Filed Outside Of 15-Day Entry Of Judgment Deadline By Clerk Was Properly Stricken By Trial Judge

Cases: Costs, Cases: Deadlines

Claiming Party’s Counsel Continued To Use East L.A. Address For Pleadings, Even Though Moving To Simi Valley, Such That Clerk’s Entry Notice To East L.A. Address Supported Striking Costs Memorandum, Which Was Filed Almost Five Months Later.             I guess we can say that the moral of AV Sikh Center v. Antelope Valley Sikh Center,

Costs, Deadlines: Premature Filing Of Costs Memorandum In 2010 Did Not Mean It Was A Nullity, Such That 2018 Motion To Tax Costs Was Way Too Late

Cases: Costs, Cases: Deadlines

Unpublished Opinion Does A Nice Job Of Discussing Modern View On Premature Costs Memo Filings.             In Paland v. Brooktrails Township Services Dist. Bd. of Directors, Case No. A156229 (1st Dist., Div. 5 Aug. 19, 2019) (unpublished), Defendant filed and served a memorandum of costs in February 2010 seeking $1,029.02 in costs incurred on appeal. 

Costs, Requests For Admissions: Jane Doe Plaintiff Losing At Trial Based On A Nonsuit Properly Assessed With $19,500 In Costs-Of-Proof Sanctions And With Routine Costs Of $107,440.35

Cases: Costs, Cases: Requests for Admission

Respondents Conceded $6,988.27 In Claimed Costs Were Not Allowable.             Doe v. Dept. of Children & Family Services, Case No. B276699 (2d Dist., Div. 8 July 18, 2019) (published; previously issued as unpublished on June 20, 2019) is a case demonstrating how respondents, on appeal, can gain appellate credibility by conceding a legal issue for

Civil Rights, Costs, Employment, Section 998: Where Thrust Of Losing Plaintiff’s Suit Was A FEHA Claim, Trial Court Properly Refused To Award CCP § 998 Costs To Winning Defendant Despite Loss On Non-FEHA Whistleblower Claim

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Costs, Cases: Employment, Cases: Section 998

Prominence Of Suit Prevailed, Plus Appellate Court Offers Tips On What Trial Courts Ought To Follow When There Is A Split In Intermediate Appellate Thought On An Issue.             In Thiry v. Pet Partners, Inc., Case No. E070851 (4th Dist., Div. 2 June 20, 2019) (unpublished), plaintiff brought a mixed FEHA/whistleblower/UCF suit based on allegations

Scroll to Top