Appellate Court Was Peeved At Appeal Of Costs Award Under $2,000. Bilaver v. Bilaver, Case No. B296881 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Apr. 27, 2021) (unpublished) is another reality check where two brothers appealed a $1,910.84 costs award in favor of an indispensable party probate estate. Because it was an indispensable party, the estate did […]
It Is Well Within The Trial Court’s Discretion To Make A Determination That Neither Party Prevailed Sufficiently To Justify An Award Of Attorney Fees. In Ayala Boring v. HPS Mechanical, Case No. D076054 (4th Dist., Div. 1 March 19, 2021) (unpublished) – which resulted in two separate appeals – contractor defendant entered into a
In So Doing, The Ninth Circuit Joins The First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Circuits In Holding That The Christiansburg Standard Applies To The Award Of Attorney’s Fees And Costs Under The Fair Housing Act. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412 (1978), held that, under the fee-shifting provision
However, 2/3 DCA Follows Roman Opinion On When To Award Costs On Non-FEHA Claims. In Chevreaux v. Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Case Nos. B291268/B292937 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Feb. 24, 2021) (unpublished), a jury returned a defense verdict in favor of a former employer on a non-FEHA, Tameny retaliation claim after she dismissed
Costs May Not Be Awarded To Prevailing FEHA Defendants Unless Plaintiff’s Action Was Frivolous, Unreasonable, Or Groundless When Brought Or Continued, But A Trial Court May Award Costs To A Prevailing Defendant For Non-FEHA Claims Litigated With FEHA Claims. In Jones v. Quality Coast, Case No. B297425 (2d Dist., Div.5 February 22, 2021) (unpublished),
The Title Issue That Started It All Was Partly Corrected And Seller Resumed Payments Years Before, But The Parties Battled On All The Way To Trial – Incurring A Combined Total Of $202,299.50 In Fees, Plus Costs. In our Mission Statement, we quote a statement made by Retired Justice Wallin in Deane Gardenhome
Particular Question Dealt With Substantial Supersedeas Bond Premiums and Interest. On January 8, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari on an appellate costs issue, in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, No. 20-334 (U.S.), to wit: “Whether, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit alone has held, district courts “lack[]
Trial Judge Did Not Abuse Discretion In Not Awarding Litigation Costs Where Ultimate Win Was Minor In Nature In Unlimited Civil Case. All litigation practitioners should be attuned to the next case, Van Taylor v. Ivie, Case No. B281545 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Jan. 26, 2021) (unpublished), where litigation costs are claimed in an
Plaintiff Adequately Alleged Negligent Misrepresentation, Submitted Evidence Demonstrating A Triable Issue Of Fact, And Defendants Did Not Establish That Plaintiff Could Not Prove The Elements Of Negligent Misrepresentation. For a nice discussion re the elements of intentional and negligent misrepresentation, we commend our readers read Borman v. Brown, Case Nos. D076239/D076748 (4th Dist.,
Reason For The Dismissal Was Plaintiffs’ Failure To Adequate Raise Or Brief The Issue. In New Livable California v. Assn of Bay Area Governments, Case No. A159235 (1st Dist., Div. 3 Dec. 18, 2020 December 18, 2020, published on Jan. 6, 2021), plaintiffs lost a Brown Act writ of mandate petition on a demurrer,
