Cases: Appealability

Appealability: Where Judgment Reserved Fee Entitlement Decision For A Later Noticed Motion, Eventual Losing Party’s Appeal Of Just The Judgment Rather Than Subsequent Fee Award Meant Appellate Court Could Not Entertain Appeal On Fee Issue Down The Line

Cases: Appealability

No Entitlement Determination Made In Judgment, So Separate Appeal Of Later Fee Order Required.             We do not want to drum a theme we have stressed before, which is to separately appeal fee determinations. We are in the Holidays, so – pa rum pum pum (ala Drummer’s Boy lyrics on a Holiday song) – we […]

Appealability, Probate: $19,125 Attorney’s Fees And $537.94 Cost Orders Affirmed On Appeal For Beneficiaries’ Bad Faith Accounting Petition Directed Against Trustee

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Probate

Decision Reminds Us That Probate Court Orders, For Appealability Purposes, Are Determined Under the Probate Code.             Armstead v. De Macias, Case No. B284275 (2d Dist., Div. 4 Oct. 16, 2018) (unpublished) involved beneficiaries’ appeal of a probate court determination that $19,125 in attorney’s fees and $537.94 in costs should be awarded to trustee for

Appealability, Sanctions: Later Order Vacating Default Judgment Was Appealable But Stayed Where Prior Appealed Order Had Required $27,968.75 In Attorney’s Fees And Costs To Vacate Default Judgment

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Sanctions

Result Was Defendant Had 25 Days After Remittitur To Pay Fee/Costs Vacate Award, With Dissenting Justice Believing That The Fees/Costs Award Should Be Reduced Down By Another $17,250.             This next case, F&S Investment Properties v. Nguyen-Stevenson, Case Nos. B281031/B281973 (2d Dist., Div. 1 Oct. 9, 2018) (unpublished), is a 2-1 decision regarding stay appealability

Appealability, Special Fee Shifting Statute: Law Of The Case Did Not Prevent Lower Court From Considering Alternative Ground For Fee Entitlement Ignored Previously In Prior Appellate Decision

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

However, Fee Recovery Under Government Code Section 800(a) Limited To $7,500 Per Case, No Matter How Many Parties Or Whether Multiple Issues Were Involved.             Fratus v. County of Contra Costa, Case No. A153424 (1st Dist., Div. 1 Sept. 28, 2018) (unpublished) is a situation where the appellate court reversed the denial of attorney’s fees

Appealability, Interpleader: Losing Defendants’ Appeal Of Adverse Discharge Order After Fee Recovery Was Timely For Purposes Of Preserving Discharge Review From The Later Fee Order

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Interpleader

However, Defendants Still Lost.             The facts are not really relevant for purposes of our post in Ponticelli v. Ason, Case No. B277763 (2d Dist., Div. 1 July 30, 2018) (unpublished) because the prime issue was whether defendants in an interpleader action timely filed an appeal on the merits of the discharge by appealing the

Appealability, Class Action: Class Representative’s Appeal Of Fee Award Against Her Counsel Was Dismissed

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Class Actions

Class Representative Was Not Aggrieved To Have Standing To Appeal.             A class representative in a misclassification wage/hour class action appealed a fee award against one of her attorneys. The appeal was dismissed because the class representative was not aggrieved, with the impacted attorney not appealing so as to preserve the issue for review.   The

Appealability, Family Law: Litigant’s Failures To Specify Fee Order As Subject Of Notice Of Appeal And As Appeal Subject In Civil Information Statement Were Fatal In Nature

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Family Law

Although Notices Of Appeal Are Construed Liberally, The Order Under Appeal Still Must Be Specified With Some Precision.             Marriage of Schoenfeld, Case No. B281835 (2d Dist., Div. 7 June 18, 2018) (unpublished) is a reminder to appellants that some precision must be made in both the notice of appeal and the appellate civil information

Appealability, Receivers, Special Fee Shifting Statutes: Grant Of Attorney’s Fees And Expenses To City Of Indio And Against Property Lender/Receivership Estate In Public Abatement Action Reversed As A Matter Of Law

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Receivers, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Two Health And Safety Code Fee Shifting Statutes And Indio Municipal Fee Shifting Provision Did Not Provide Bases For Fees/Expenses Against Lender/Receiver.             In Kaura v. Stabilis Fund III, LLC/City of Indio (as intervenor), Case No. E065751 (4th Dist., Div. 2 June 13, 2018) (partially published; appealability discussion not published), lender with a deed of

Appealability/Discovery/Sanctions:  Separate Discovery Sanctions Cannot Be Aggregated For Purposes Of Meeting $5,000 Appealability Threshold

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Discovery, Cases: Sanctions

Two Separate Sanctions Below $5,000 Cannot Be Aggregated For Appealability Purposes.             In Mitchell Anthony Productions, LLC v. Baron, Case No. B282974 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Mar. 28, 2018) (unpublished), the trial judge awarded $4,860 in discovery sanctions on separate motions to compel further discovery responses to the interrogatories and requests

Scroll to Top