Author name: Marc Alexander

Costs: Referee’s Costs Were Awardable In Partnership Damages/Accounting Dispute

Cases: Costs

  Fourth District, Division 1 Sustains Award of Referee’s Costs to Prevailing Party.      In Behne v. Chodur, Case Nos. D052416/D053551 (Sept. 24, 2009) (unpublished), a brother and sister unfortunately got into a partnership damages/accounting donnybrook. An accounting referee was appointed by the court to determine the net proceeds of several real estate projects involved […]

Voluntary Dismissal Of Tort Claims: Be Careful—If Contract Clause Allows For Recovery, You May Not Seek Refuge Under Santisas

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Section 1717

Second District, Division 1 Affirms Fee Award to Broker Under Broadly Worded CAR Form Agreement.      Under Santisas v. Goodin, 17 Cal.4th 599 (1998), a voluntary dismissal will end fee exposure on contract claims. However, there is a hitch (usually is). The dismissal will not necessarily insulate against fee exposure for tort or noncontract claims.

Requests For Admissions: Court Of Appeal Reverses Denial Of RFA Sanctions Where Trial Court Found No Reasonable Basis for Denials But Found No Additional Work Expended

Cases: Requests for Admission

Fifth District Reversed, Finding Mandatory Sanction Was In Order.      O.K., readers, go to our category “Requests for Admission” for a primer on when fees can be awarded for sanctions when a party fails to admit the truth of RFAs. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 2033.420(a)-(b).) Now, we have a reversal of a trial court ruling

Discovery Sanctions: California Court Of Appeal Affirms $6,632.50 In Discovery Sanctions Against Party Who Failed To Adequately Answer Special Interrogatories

Cases: Discovery

Published Decision Is Must Reading For All Litigators Engaged in Discovery Disputes.      We knew that we would enjoy the next decision, because it analogizes discovery disputes to the imagery of Hotspur (Henry Percy)—who is graphically depicted in Shakespeare’s Henry IV as being blinded by a combative nature and incapable of informally resolving a disagreement

SLAPP: Appellate Fees For Sustaining Lower Court’s SLAPP Ruling Are Recoverable

Cases: SLAPP

  First District, Division 5 So Holds in Unpublished Decision.      Plaintiff had his malicious prosecution action stricken through a SLAPP motion, a ruling that was appealed. After obtaining a dismissal of the appeal because it was untimely filed, defendants filed a motion to obtain appellate fees for successfully defending the SLAPP ruling on appeal.

Special Fee Shifting Statute and Fee Clause Interpretation: Singapore Law Governs Non-Statutory Issues

Cases: Choice of Law, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Preemption, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  Ninth Circuit Reverses Denial of Fees Award, Remanding for A New Look in COGSA, Bill of Lading Case.      So what happens when you have a seemingly statutory choice-of-law clause (that means no attorney’s fees) and a contractual clause (that may mean attorney’s fees) in the same case? Well, if you are the litigant

Scroll to Top