Author name: Marc Alexander

Deeds Of Trust: $112,390 In Contractual Fees And $4,812.46 In Costs Affirmed Against Borrower Losing Challenges To Validity Of Note And Deed Of Trust

Cases: Deeds of Trust

Once Forgery Challenges Were Lost, The Fees And Costs Orders Were Just Fine.             In Ameris Bank v. Jean-Baptiste, Case Nos. D079378/D079944 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Dec. 15, 2022) (unpublished), borrower lost forgery challenges to a note and deed of trust.  Once the validity of the loan documents was sustained in favor of bank by […]

Appealability, Civil Rights: Disabled Plaintiff Suing Defendant For Website Violations Under The Unruh Act Was Properly Assessed With Defense Attorney’s Fees Of $45,419.50 After Voluntarily Dismissing His Action

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Civil Rights

Plaintiff’s Injunctive Relief Allegations Triggered Civil Code Section 55, Which Allowed Fees To The Defense—Allegations Matter In These Cases.             Sandoval v. Nippon Life Ins. Co. of America, Case No. E077245 (4th Dist., Div. 2 Dec. 12, 2022) (unpublished) is an interesting disabled person website case which was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice after some discovery. 

Section 998: Subaru’s 998 Offer Was Reasonable And Made In Good Faith, Such That Plaintiff Properly Only Awarded Pre-offer Costs And Subaru Was Properly Awarded Post-offer Costs

Cases: Section 998

Plaintiff’s Appeal Of Order Staying Fee Motion To Determine 998 Offer Validity Was Non-appealable, But Validity Of The Offer Means That No Post-Offer Fees Are Due to Plaintiff On Remand (Likely).             Smalley v. Subaru of America, Inc., Case Nos. G059904/G060441 (4th Dist., Div. 3 December 13, 2022) (unpublished) is complementary of our July 5,

Fee Clause Interpretation, Lodestar: $547,465.10 Fee Award And $23,589.25 Costs Award To Prevailing Defendant Sellers Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Lodestar

Liability Cap Did Not Apply To Fees, Out-Of-County Attorneys Showed Good Cause To Represent Defendants In Tuolumne County, And Trial Judge Reduced Fee Request By 20%.             In Apartment Rental Assistance II, Inc. v. 80 Oak Hills, L.P., Case No. F083238 (5th Dist. Dec. 13, 2022) (unpublished), buyer plaintiffs lost a summary judgment to seller

In The News . . . . Wells Fargo’s Legal Specialty Group Predicts That U.S. Firms Will Increase Pre-Discounted Hourly Rates By 7-8% Next Year

In The News

2022 Rates Were Lower Because Of Discounts And Increased Write-Offs.             U.S. law firm leaders informed Wells Fargo Legal Specialty Group that their firms will increase hourly rates by an average of 7-8% in 2023, before discounting.  For 2022, rates were lower because of bigger discounts and increased write-offs.

Appealability, Family Law: Failure To Independently Appeal Family Code Section 271 Sanctions Motion Meant The Merits Could Not Be Reviewed

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Family Law

$25,000 Sanctions Order Was Not Subject To Review.             In Marriage of Freeman, Case No. B311411 (2d Dist., Div. 6 Dec. 6, 2022) (unpublished; opinion after rehearing), ex-wife was peeved she was assessed with Family Code section 2071 sanctions to the tune of $25,000.  However, her challenges could not be entertained because she did not

Requests For Admission: $1,000,981.50 In Costs Of Proof Sanctions Awarded To Defendants Who Defeated Plaintiffs’ Claims At Trial Are Reversed On Appeal

Cases: Requests for Admission

Plaintiffs’ Lack Of Success At Trial Does Not Demonstrate That They Acted Unreasonably Or In Bad Faith In Denying Requests For Admissions Propounded By Defendants.             In Walter v. Estate Strategies, Case No. B280172 (2d Dist., Div. 6 December 5, 2022) (unpublished), defendants moved for and were awarded $1,000,981.50 in costs of proof sanctions, under

Allocation: 4/3 DCA Affirms Trial Court’s Apportionment Of Plaintiffs’ Fee Award Between Both Contractor And Subcontractor Where Subcontractor’s Contract With Plaintiffs Did Not Provide For Fee Recovery

Cases: Allocation

Statutory Basis Supported Plaintiff’s Recovery of Attorney Fees Directly From Subcontractor.             In Nassif v. Mission Pools of Escondido, Case No. G060433 (4th Dist., Div. 3 December 5, 2022) (unpublished), swimming pool contractor and subcontractor were sued for substandard work relating to the design and construction of a swimming pool.  Pursuant to the global

Scroll to Top