Author name: Marc Alexander

Consumer Statutes: Plaintiff Not Recovering On A Majority Of Her Swimming Pool/Spa Claims Was Not Entitled To Attorney’s Fees Under Business & Professions Code Section 7168

Cases: Consumer Statutes

Plaintiff Did Obtain Compensatory Damages On Other Claims, But No Need To Award Other Fees Where Plaintiff Did Not Prevail On The Swimming Pool Claims.             In Lee v. Cardiff, Case No. A163817 (1st Dist., Div. 1 July 13, 2023) (unpublished), plaintiff brought claims relating to a swimming pool/spa and other constructions claims.  Plaintiff did

Off Topics: Co-Contributor Marc’s Article On Mediator Settlement Proposals Is Now Published In Advocate

Off Topics

The Article Is Entitled Mediator Settlement Proposals: A Perspective.         Co-contributor Marc has written an article on an "off topic." The article, published in the July 2023 issue of Advocate, can also be read here: Download Alexander-July23-article         Marc serves as a mediator and is affiliated with ARC/Alternative Resolution Centers. He can be contacted at

Special Fee Shifting Statutes: County Properly Awarded $26,065.41 In Attorney’s Fees And Costs In Nuisance Abatement Proceeding

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Cannabis Cultivation On Residential Property Was The Factual Backdrop.             Governmental authorities may receive an award of attorney’s fees and costs for abating property nuisances under both state statutes and municipal ordinances, in this case Government Code section 25845(b), (c) and Riverside County Ordinance No. 725.  The County obtained summary judgment against a property owner

Prevailing Party: Cross-Complainant Winning More Than Plaintiff Was The Prevailing Party For Fee Recovery Purposes

Cases: Prevailing Party

Cross-Complainant Obtained An $88,130.06 Net Recovery, Such That A Subsequent $90,013 Prevailing Party Fee Determination Was No Abuse Of Discretion.             In VanLaw Food Products, Inc. v. New England Counry Foods, LLC, Case No. G061375 (4th Dist., Div. 3 July 6, 2023) (unpublished), plaintiff received $27,441.25 under its complaint, and cross-complaint received $115,571.31 on its

Section 1717: Dismissal Of Complaint Alleging Breach Of Contract, Whether Based On Contract Or Breach Of A Contractual Duty, Did Not Result In Fee Exposure Under Section 1717

Cases: Section 1717

Santisas (Our Leading Case #6) Dictated The Result.             In Rubin v. Cho, Case No. A165667 (1st Dist., Div. 5 July 6, 2023) (unpublished), close to trial, plaintiff dismissed a breach of contract complaint alleging the seller of a house failed to disclose all known material facts and defects affecting the property and make other

Arbitration: $4.5 Million In Attorney Investigative Fees And $36,653 In Post-Arbitration Confirmation Costs To Prevailing Parties Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Arbitration

Broad Contractual Dispute Resolution Clauses Supported The Appellate Results.             As we have said many times in this category, arbitration awards—unless against public policy—are hard to overturn because the merits of the award are usually not subject to rescrutiny by trial or appellate courts.  Also, the emerging trend is that post-arbitration court proceedings fees are

Costs, Private Attorney General: In Case Involving Extension Of 241 Toll Road Near San Clemente, 4/2 DCA Affirms Denial Of 1021.5 Fees To HOA, Reverses And Remands Denial Of Fees To Environmental Parties, And Affirms Award Of Costs Against HOA

Cases: Costs, Cases: Private Attorney General (CCP 1021.5)

Lots Of Moving Parts Here, But The Remand For Environmental Parties Is Not An Automatic Endorsement Of Receiving 1021.5 Fees.             City of San Clemente v. Department of Transportation et al., Case No. E077153 (4th Dist., Div. 2 June 29, 2023) (published) arose out of the Corridor Agency’s approved extension of State Route 241 (known

Family Law: Lower Court’s Ignoring All Of Ex-Husband’s Evidence, But Using Some Of It, Resulted In Reversal Of Child Modification And $10,000 Needs-Based Fee Award

Cases: Family Law

Appellate Court Was Bothered By Inconsistent Reasoning And Use Of Selective Evidence While Finding Appellant’s Proof Was Not Credible In Entirety.             In Swan v. Hatchett, Case Nos. A163825 et al. (1st Dist., Div. 4 June 29, 2023) (published), the lower court refused to consider ex-husband’s evidence as uncredible in child support modification and Family

Scroll to Top