Author name: Marc Alexander

Special Fee Shifting Statute: CCP § 1038 Does Not Allow For Award Of Defense Costs Against Party’s Attorney

Uncategorized

  $11,457.65 Fee Award Goes POOF!      We love the opening and closing in Settle v. State of California (McKiernan), Case No. B249236 (2d Dist., Div. 6 July 23, 2014) (published), written by Justice Yegan on behalf of a 3-0 panel.      John Vachon, photographer.  “Glorified Hamburgers”.  Oct. 1938.  Library of Congress.       The opening […]

Allocation/Equity/Trade Secrets: Where Default Judgment Reversed For 3 Out Of 4 Defendants, Attorney’s Fees Had To Be Revisited Although Fourth Defendant Conceded Liability.

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Equity, Cases: Trade Secrets

  Complaint Prayer Gave Notice, But Fee Amount “Re-do” Necessary on Remand.      In Lawson-Hawks Ins., Inc. v. McVey Ins. Broker, Inc., Case No. H038466 (6th Dist. July 22, 2014) (unpublished), plaintiff sued four defendants (an insurance agency, an insurance brokerage company, and certain agents) for willful violation of trade secrets. Plaintiff obtained a default

Private Attorney General: Denial Of $382,382.50 In Attorney’s Fees To Appealing Parties Was Justified Because Their Financial Interest Was Not Disproportionate To Fees Expended

Cases: Private Attorney General (CCP 1021.5)

  Appealing Parties Saved $31 Million in Funds Being Transferred, With Whitley and Maywood Providing Cost/Benefit Analytical Compass.      Children and Families Comm’n of Fresno County v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Case No. F066233 (5th Dist. July 22, 2014) (published) was a situation where the lower court denied attorney’s fees under CCP § 1021.5 to

Prevailing Party/Section 1717: Defense Successfully Asserting Lack Of Standing Entitled To Fee Recovery Against Non-Prevailing Plaintiff Based On Civil Code Section 1717

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

  Real Property Service Case Found Dispositive.      After the business deteriorated, a plaintiff under an agreement with a fees clause sued defendant for selling a florist business, raising contract, UCL, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation claims. In Phase I of a court trial, the trier of fact found that the plaintiff lacked standing to sue

Arbitration/Employment: Agreement With Arbitration Provision Not Unconscionable Because It Had Reciprocal Fees Clause

Cases: Arbitration, Cases: Employment

  1/1 DCA Reverses Lower Court’s Unconscionability Determination Below.      In Galen v. Redfin Corp., Case No. A138642 (1st Dist., Div. 1 July 21, 2014) (published), a lower court found unconscionable an arbitration provision in an employment contract under California law. The appellate court reversed, finding the FAA applied and disagreeing that the provision was

Eminent Domain: Condemnee Winning $8 Million Jury Verdict Award Was Entitled To Litigation Expenses (Inclusive Of Fees) Erroneously Denied By Trial Judge

Cases: Eminent Domain

  Condemnor’s Final Settlement Offer Was $954,000; Condemnee’s Final Demand Was $4.5 Million—Condemnor’s Offer Was Not Done With Good Faith Accuracy.      California’s eminent domain statutory scheme has a very specific fee shifting statute, allowing successful condemnees to obtain recovery of litigation expenses (including attorney’s fees) as measured by the final offers from condemnors versus

In The News . . . . 2013 Proposition 65 Settlement Numbers Are Out

In The News

  If We Read Them Right, A Big Portion Went to Attorney’s Fees/Costs.      We give a HAT TIP to Bruce Nye, a seasoned litigator who has been doing a very entertaining, informative blog called “Cal Biz Lit” for a number of years. We thank him for summarizing the 2013 settlement numbers for Proposition 65

Civil Rights: $53,704 Fee Award Against Losing FEHA Plaintiff Affirmed

Cases: Civil Rights

  Case Was Unreasonable/Without Foundation, and Trial Court Lowered Lodestar One Half Based on Plaintiff’s Ability to Pay.      FEHA plaintiff lost on a summary judgment motion, with the lower court finding that the case was unreasonable and without foundation from inception based on proof that there was objective basis for what the governmental entity

Off Topic . . . . In Memoriam To Ray Alvarado

Off Topics

       It is with sadness that we report that Raymond G. (Ray) Alvarado recently passed away. He is a founding member of AlvaradoSmith, where co-contributors Marc and Mike have practiced since February 2008. Ray is a giant in the Orange County legal community and a “name” partner/shareholder in several firms. Ray had a ready

Scroll to Top