POOF!: Trial Court’s Granting Of Defendant’s Motion For Relief From Default Judgment Of $1,402,124, Which Included $103,728 In Attorney Fees And $1,997 In Costs, Affirmed On Appeal

Plaintiff Failed To Comply With The Statutory Requirements For Substitute Service Of Process.

            Code Civ. Proc. section 415.20(b) provides the process by which substitute service of a summons and complaint may be made upon a party: “If a copy of the summons and complaint cannot with reasonable diligence be personally delivered to the person to be served …, a summons may be served by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint at the person’s dwelling house, usual place of abode, usual place of business, or usual mailing address other than a United States Postal Service post office box, in the presence of a competent member of the household …, at least 18 years of age, who shall be informed of the contents thereof, and by thereafter mailing a copy of the summons and of the complaint by first-class mail, postage prepaid to the person to be served at the place where a copy of the summons and complaint were left.”

            In Centex Homes v. D.L. Walton, Case No. F077446 (5th Dist., August 10, 2020) (unpublished), plaintiff, declaring it had delivered a copy of the summons and complaint through substitute service, obtained a $1,402,124 default judgment against defendant.  The judgment included $103,728 In Attorney Fees And $1,997 In Costs.

            Approximately nine months later, defendant successfully filed a motion for Code Civ. Proc. section 473 relief from the default and default judgment – asserting plaintiff failed to comply with the statutory requirements for substitute service of process – because plaintiff had served defendant’s adult daughter at a residence wholly unrelated to defendant’s business and residential address, and had additionally failed to thereafter mail a copy of the summons and complaint.  With that, plaintiff’s $1.4 Million default judgment went POOF!

            Plaintiff fared no better on appeal – with the 5th District affirming defendant’s relief from the default and default judgment due to the improper substitute service.

Scroll to Top