Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Special Fee Shifting Statute: Felony Drunk Driving Civil Fee Shifting Statute Justified $65,970 Fee Award In Car Accident Case

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  Trial Court Did Not Abuse Discretion in Fixing Fee Award Even Though Both Drivers Were Intoxicated In Accident.      Dueling intoxicated car drivers had an interesting fee-shifting dispute in a civil case. What occurred in McBeath v. Bustos, Case No. B246122 (2d Dist., Div. 4 Mar. 18, 2014) (unpublished) was that plaintiff (who was […]

Costs/Special Fee Shifting Statute/Small Claims: Are Legal Consultation Expenses Recoverable As Fees For A Prevailing Party In A Small Claims Action?

Cases: Costs, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  Answer: No Case On The Issue We Are Aware Of, But We Will Give Our Guess.      A blog follower asked us if a small claims prevailing party can collect legal consultation expenses as “cost of the action” after prevailing—an apparent claim often made by winning small claims litigants.      We could not locate

Prevailing Party/Special Fee Shifting Statute: Plaintiff Losing Against Defendant Properly Exposed To Adverse Fee Award Under Mobilehome Residency Law

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Arose Is Arose Is Arose Is Arose Gertrude Stein.  Carl Van Vechten, photographer.  1935.  Library of Congress. “Arose From” Language Encompassed Other Claims; Losing Plaintiff Did Not Prevail Given Specific Prevailing Party Definition Under Statute.      In the fee area, one needs to pay particular attention to the wording of a specific fee-shifting statute. The

Civil Rights FEHA/Family Law/Special Agricultural Fee Shifting Statute/Trespass Dominate Unpublished Decisions For January 15, 2014

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Family Law, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes, Cases: Trespass

  Civil Rights FEHA: Chiang v. County of Los Angeles, Case No. B238948 (2d Dist., Div. 1 Jan. 15, 2014) (Unpublished).      County won summary judgment but appealed the lower court’s refusal to award it requested attorney’s fees of $324,098.80 as the prevailing party. The appellate court affirmed the conclusion that fees are not guided

Special Fee Shifting Statute: Successful Brown Act Winner Accomplishing “Very, Very Little–If Anything” Properly Denied Fee Recovery

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  Special Circumstances Were Shown in This One.      Plaintiff/petitioner in Citizens for Open and Public Participation v. City of Montebello, Case No. B244106 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Dec. 23, 2013) (unpublished) sought writ relief for closed session Brown Act violations, with the lower court finding some violations but ultimately denying writ relief and petitioner’s

Special Fee Shifting Statute: Litigant Winning Civil Harassment Restraining Order Dispute On Appeal Remanded To Trial Court To Fix Fees

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  Appellate Court Deferred to Trial Court.      In a very frequent occurrence, the appellate court in Brown v. Evpak, Case No. C069590 (3d Dist. Dec. 3, 2013) (unpublished) did what we have seen in the past with respect to these types of disputes. After affirming a case with a civil harassment fee-shifting statute, it

Prevailing Party/Sanctions/Special Fee Shifting Statute: U.S. District Judge England Denies Clean Water Act Attorney’s Fees To Defendant After Plaintiffs Voluntarily Dismissed Citizsens Suit Due To High Ongoing Litigation Costs

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Sanctions, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  District Court Also Denied Plaintiff’s Requests for Sanctions After Defendant Withdrew Rule 11 Motion After Grant of Voluntary Dismissal; Reasons For Both — No Prevailing Party.      The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365, allows citizen suits and has a fee-shifting clause which allows a district court, in its discretion, to award litigation

Special Fee Shifting Statute: Motorcycle Dealership Winning Vehicle Code Section 11713.3 Claim For Franchisor Wrongfully Withholding Consent To Dealership Sale Correctly Awarded $533,350 In Fees

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

However, Dealer Not Entitled To Fees For Administrative Proceedings/Related Writ Proceedings Associated With Administrative Level Battles.      Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., Case No. B236705 (2d Dist., Div. 6 Nov. 26, 2013) (published) involved a retail motorcycle dealership obtaining a jury verdict award of over $1.3 million in compensatory/punitive damages against

Special Fee Shifting Statutes: Shareholder, Albeit With Little Time Left In This Status, Entitled To Unreduced Attorney’s Fees For Obtaining Inspection Of Corporation Defendant’s Documents Under Corporations Code Section 1604

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  Trial Court Did Abuse Discretion By Reducing Discounted Fee Request By Another Half.      Corporations Code section 1604 provides that if a corporation fails without justification to comply with a shareholder demand for inspection of documents, the corporation can be assessed with attorney’s fees to reimburse the shareholder in connection with litigation involving the

POOF!/Private Attorney General/Special Fee Shifting Provision: Reversal Of Federal Due Process Violations Count Required Remand Redetermination Of Fee Awards To Prevailing Parties In Reverse Validation Action

Cases: POOF!, Cases: Private Attorney General (CCP 1021.5), Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  Fee Entitlement Was Established Under Public Records Act and Private Attorney General Statute, But Reversal of Civil Rights Judgment Determination Required a “Relook” All Around.      Although quite a lengthy decision, Community Youth Athletic Center v. City of National City, Case Nos. D060001/D061141 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Oct. 30, 2013) (published) does show that

Scroll to Top