Cases: Section 1717

Settlement: Attorney’s Fees Awarded When Party Seeking Enforcement Of Settlement Agreement Did Not Expressly Obtain Retention Of Jurisdiction Prior To Lawsuit Dismissal

Cases: Section 1717, Cases: Settlement

First District, Division 3 Highlights Pitfalls of CCP Section 664.6 in the Retention of Jurisdiction Area.      Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 concerns judicial enforcement of settlement agreements through an expeditious motion procedure. The last sentence of this provision states: “If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to […]

Prevailing Party: Voluntary Settlement Of Contractually-Based Claims, Even Though In Tort Or Equity, Prevents Award Of Fees Under Santisas

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Fifth District So Rules In Unpublished Decision, Rejecting That “Labels” Rather Than Substance Are Governing.       Santisas v. Goodin, 17 Cal.4th 599 (1998) [one of our Leading Cases] held that Civil Code section 1717 bars an action voluntarily dismissed as a result of a settlement to the extent contract claims were involved in the dismissed

Civil Rights: Rejected Informal Settlement Offers Can Be Used As An Indicator Of Success For Purposes of Calculating Attorney’s Fees Lodestar

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Section 1717, Cases: Settlement

Third Circuit Court of Appeals So Holds Under 42 U.S. C. Section 1988; California State Court Decisions Split In Analogous Areas, But Ninth Circuit Disagrees.      On July 23, 2009, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, in Lohman v. Duryea Borough, __ F.3d __, 2009 WL 2183056 (3d Cir. 2009), affirmed a district judge’s decision

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff Who Dismissed Action But Beat Back Defense Fee Request Was Not Prevailing Party Under Civil Code Section 1717 In The Overall Sense So As To Garner Fees For Beating Opposition Fee Request

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Second District, Division 6 Follows Presley and Mustachio in so Deciding.      The beginning quote in this case nicely summarizes the lesson from the next case: “A party who prevails on appeal is not necessarily the prevailing party in an action.”      Wood v. Santa Monica Escrow Co., Case No. B205939 (2d Dist., Div. 6

Civil Code Section 1717 And Alter Ego Case: Litigant Beating Alter Ego Theory Entitled to Fee Award

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Second District, Division 4 Affirms $20,000 Fees/Cost Award to Alter Ego Winner.      In Legacy Construction and Development, Inc. v. De Francesca, Case No. B208851 (2d Dist., Div. 4 July 13, 2009) (unpublished), a defendant, following presentation of plaintiff’s declaratory relief case, obtained a ruling that he was not the alter ego of a separate

Civil Code Section 1717 And Mediation Clause: Real Estate Buyer Losing Fraud Case Suffers $122,100 Adverse Fee Award

Cases: Mediation, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

Second District, Division 6 Also Interprets Mediation Requirement in CAR Form Contract.      Buyers sometimes get confused over their obligations under CAR real estate form contracts, especially the ones involving an award of attorney’s fees (which clauses have been held to reach fraud/nondisclosure claims). One of the most frequent causes of confusion is the mediation

Prevailing Party: Unsuccessful Injunctive Action Was Discrete Legal Proceeding Allowing For Award Of Civil Code Section 1717 Fees

Cases: Arbitration, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

First District, Division 4 Follow Acosta-Otay Line of Cases.      There has been quite a splash of jurisprudence lately on the question of when a prevailing party can be adjudged in mixed legal-arbitration proceedings. The next case is the latest addition to the case law on this subject.      In Turner v. Schultz, Case Nos.

Civil Code Section 1717: Bankruptcy Related Actions Were Recoverable By Successful Lender

Cases: Bankruptcy Efforts, Cases: Discovery, Cases: Section 1717

Fourth District, Division 1 Finds No Basis To Assess Fees Against Nonsignatory Individual Principal In the Absence of an Alter Ego Finding.      In New Century Corporation v. Positive Investments, Inc., Case No. ECU03797 (4th Dist., Div. 1 July 8, 2009) (unpublished), lender was awarded attorney’s fees of $83,329 under an attorney’s fees clause of

Civil Code Section 1717: Court Of Appeal Sustains $15,000 Fee Award For $37,000 Rental Delinquency Case

Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Section 1717

Fourth District, Division 2 Rebuffs Request for Over $40,000 in Fees.      Plaintiff landlord sued and ultimately recovered $37,420 in delinquent rent (plus $10,295.96 in interest) from former tenants who had abandoned commercial premises being rented in the past. Landlord won a prior judicial arbitration, being awarded $13,622 in fees and costs. However, when landlord

Scroll to Top