Section 1717: Motion To Vacate Was Not “On The Contract” Because It Was Not Brought To Enforce Or Interpret A Settlement Agreement
Cases: Section 1717This next opinion, Karr v. Statewide Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 245147 (2d Dist., Div. 1 Aug. 23, 2013) (unpublished), has two interesting points: (1) a motion to vacate a summary judgment was not “on the contract” for Civil Code section 1717 fee recovery purposes given the existence of a narrow fees clause in […]
