Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Reasonableness Of Fees: Plaintiffs Denied Contractual Fees Altogether Did Not Adequately Address All Reasons For Denial In Their Appellants’ Opening Brief

Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Responding To Some More Of The Defense Arguments In The Reply Brief Was Too Late.             In GI Excellence, Inc. v. Padda, Case No. E076843 (4th Dist., Div. 2 Nov. 7, 2022) (unpublished), plaintiffs won around $65,000 in compensatory damages and then moved to recover $755,300 in contractual attorney’s fees.  The lower court denied the […]

Civil Rights, Multipliers, Reasonableness Of Fees: Ninth Circuit Confirms Significant Haircut To Serial ADA Plaintiff’s Attorney’s Fees And Costs Award

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Multipliers, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

No Abuse Of Discretion In District’s Reduction Of Fees And Costs Award To $9,851 From The Requested $34,899 Where Work Was Routine And Boilerplate, There Was A Lack Of Opposition, And Much Of The Motion Practice Was Unnecessary.             In Shayler v. 1310 PCH, LLC, Case No. 21-56130 (9th Cir. October 24, 2022) (published), serial

Reasonableness Of Fees: Failure To Provide Adequate Record Led To Affirmance Of $365,455.02 Fee Award To Defendants

Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Lengthy Litigation Can Lead To Large Fee Awards, Which Require An Adequate Record To Challenge.             The moral from Westpark Village, et al. v. Khanna, Case No. A164667 (1st Dist., Div. 2 Sept. 28, 2022) (unpublished), which involved a contractual fee award of $365,495.02 against defendants after years of litigation, is simple—make sure you have

Landlord/Tenant, Reasonableness Of Fees: $684,000 Fee Award In Favor Of Tenants And Against Landlord Reversed And Remanded

Cases: Landlord/Tenant, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Appellate Court Did Not Buy That Trial Court Could Just Adopt Plaintiffs’ Voluntary Reduction Without Addressing Other Objections.             We posted today about a published decision between the parties.  Separately, Sarkany v. West, Case No. A161728 (1st Dist., Div. 2 Aug. 30, 2022) (unpublished) was landlords’ appeal from an adverse $684,000 attorney’s fees award in

Lodestar, Private Attorney General, Reasonableness Of Fees: FEHA Fee Recovery To Plaintiff’s Attorney Affirmed As Far As Reductions But Remand Issued To Determine Reasonable Hourly Rate Based On Out-Of-Town Rates

Cases: Lodestar, Cases: Private Attorney General (CCP 1021.5), Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Plaintiff’s FEHA Request Was Reduced Drastically, But The Award Likely Will Go Up Some When Out-Of-Town Rates Are Considered—Although The $700,000 Award Was Substantial.             When you are doing appellate work on abuse of discretion issues, the primary issue may be whether the lower court used the correct legal principles as far as reaching its

Fees, Civil Rights, Employment: USDC Central District Judge Awards Full Freight Fee Award In Waiting-Time Penalties Case

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Employment, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Record

Judge Finds That Fee Award Of $342,782.50 Is Reasonable In Waiting-Time Penalties Case.         On June 17, 2022, the Hon. R. Gary Klausner issued a fee award to the prevailing plaintiff in a waiting-time penalties case. Caley Rae Pavillard v. Ignite International, Ltd. et al., USDC Central District No. 2:21-cv-01306-RGK-Ex.        

Ethics, Reasonableness Of Fees: 2/8 DCA Justice Wiley Suggests That Ethical Games And Unprofessionalism Will Justify A Fee Recovery Denial Or Reduction

Cases: Ethics, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Case Did Not Involve Fees, But His Lesson Should Be Paid Attention To.             Although the opinion in Field v. U.S. Bank National Association, Case No. B309111 (2d Dist., Div. 8 June 9, 2022) (published) is not an attorney’s fees decision per se, an observation early on in the opinion, authored by Justice Wiley, should

Costs, Laffey Matrix, Reasonableness Of Fees: Losing Defendants/Cross-Complainants Properly Saddled With RFA Proof Of Sanctions Fees And Routine Costs

Cases: Costs, Cases: Laffey Matrix, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Prevailing Parties Requested $393,945.30 In Fees, But Only Awarded $38,920.14—A Win, But Adverse Party Still Unsuccessfully Appealed.             The next case, Duncombe v. Barfresh Food Group, Inc., Case No. B308385 (2d Dist., Div. 2 May 31, 2022) (unpublished), demonstrates an important lesson:  where you obtain a significantly diminished fee award at the trial court level,

Prevailing Party, Reasonableness of Fees, Section 1717: Section 1717 Fees Award Of About $40,000 Affirmed For Plaintiff Who Had Fraud Claim Dismissed By Trial Court And Received Only A Portion Of Requested Damages After Bench Trial

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Section 1717

A One-Sided Fees Provision Entitled Plaintiff To Reciprocal Prevailing Party Fees Under Section 1717, And A Trial Court’s Determination As To Reasonableness Of Fees Will Not Be Disturbed Absent A Showing That The Trial Court Is Clearly Wrong.             In Hernandez v. Thottam, Case No. B306547 (2d Dist., Div. 4 May 10, 2022) (unpublished), plaintiff

Block Billing, Reasonableness Of Fees: Even With Block Billing, $170,000 Fee Award—After A $64,000 Reduction—Was No Abuse Of Discretion

Cases: Block Billing, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Block Billing Criticisms Are Fair, Depending On The Circumstances.             Simons v. Superior Court, Case No. B309885 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Mar. 25, 2022) (unpublished) is a situation where the appellate court affirmed a Civil Code section 1717 fee award, even with high hourly rates and block billing, when the fee factual finder awarded $170,000

Scroll to Top