Cases: Laffey Matrix

Laffey Matrix, Lodestar, Reasonableness Of Fees, SLAPP, Substantiation Of Reasonableness of Fees: $50,305 SLAPP Appellate Fee Award To Prevailing Defendants Is Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Laffey Matrix, Cases: Lodestar, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: SLAPP, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

Lower Court Reduced The Requested $95,519.88 In Appellate Fees To Almost Half. In Malik v. Carlson & Gevelinger, Case No. C101751 (3d Dist. Feb. 20, 2026) (unpublished), prevailing defendants earlier had been awarded SLAPP trial level fees of $14,960 (out of a requested $37,917.48) against plaintiffs, with the lower court reducing for requested hourly rates […]

Laffey Matrix, Lodestar, SLAPP:  SLAPP Fee Award, At Hourly Rates Higher Than Billed Rates, Was Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Laffey Matrix, Cases: Lodestar, Cases: SLAPP

Lower Discounted Rates Are Not Preclusive On Lodestar Fee Award By Lower Court, With Laffey Matrix Not Having To Be Blindly Followed. O’Hill Capital v. Phillips, Case Nos. G063268 et al. (4th Dist., Div. 3 Nov. 10, 2025) (unpublished), involved a SLAPP grant to defendants, which triggered a mandatory fee award—if the fees requested were

Laffey Matrix: For Complex Federal Fee-Shifting Cases In The District Of Columbia, Many Courts Are Endorsing Use Of The Fitzpatrick Matrix

Cases: Laffey Matrix

Vanderbilt Professor And His Students Updated Information From The U.S. Attorney’s Office In The Original Laffey Matrix.                Although it has not been used outside of the District of Columbia, D.C. fee claimants now have another alternative for establishing reasonable hourly rates of their attorneys, with some caveats:  the Fitzpatrick Matrix.                Vanderbilt Professor Brian

Laffey Matrix, Lodestar, Reasonableness Of Fees: Lower Court Erred By Too Drastically Cutting Prevailing Party Contractual Fee Request From Around $700,000 To $198,445

Cases: Laffey Matrix, Cases: Lodestar, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Lower Court Did Not Support Reduced Hourly Rate And Substantial Time Cuts. Free haircut on Saturday morning in W.M. Scott's general store. Farrington. Chatham County, North Carolina. Library of Congress. Marion Post Wolcott, photographer.  September 1940.             Based on the Ninth Circuit’s Moreno decision which we have cited many times, federal courts in California need

Construction, Laffey Matrix, Lodestar, Reasonableness Of Fees: Los Angeles County Superior Court Awards A Little Over $1.3 Million In Fees And About $82,000 In Costs In Construction Dispute With Contractual Fees Clause Entitlement

Cases: Construction, Cases: Laffey Matrix, Cases: Lodestar, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Decision Provides Insights Into Judicial Resolution Of Contested Fee And Costs Issues.             Because there has not been a lot of fee or costs decisions in the last couple of weeks, we report on a Los Angeles County Superior Court (Norwalk) final ruling on attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing plaintiff in WnG Construction

Laffey Matrix, Probate, Reasonableness Of Fees: Probate Court Properly Lowered Requested Attorney’s Fees For Trust Work Based On Its Knowledge And Experience

Cases: Laffey Matrix, Cases: Probate, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Lower Court Did Not Have to Credit The Laffey Matrix.             Melbostad v. Kasales, Case No. A165361 (1st Dist., Div. 3 June 16, 2023) (unpublished) demonstrates how, in California state court cases, a trial court is able to draw upon its own knowledge and experience in determining a reasonable lodestar hourly rate and in determining

Laffey Matrix, Probate, Sanctions, SLAPP: Lower Court Did Not Err In Fixing SLAPP Defense Fees In Two Defendants’ Favor

Cases: Laffey Matrix, Cases: Probate, Cases: Sanctions, Cases: SLAPP

Also, A Probate Court Properly Sanctioned Attorney For Violating Local Rule Page Limitations.             In Tukes v. Richard, Case Nos. B307242 et al. (2d Dist., Div. 8 July 12, 2022) (published), plaintiff lost SLAPP motions against two defendants, with the lower court awarding mandatory prevailing party fees of $49,071.50 and $26,905, respectively, after making some

Costs, Laffey Matrix, Reasonableness Of Fees: Losing Defendants/Cross-Complainants Properly Saddled With RFA Proof Of Sanctions Fees And Routine Costs

Cases: Costs, Cases: Laffey Matrix, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Prevailing Parties Requested $393,945.30 In Fees, But Only Awarded $38,920.14—A Win, But Adverse Party Still Unsuccessfully Appealed.             The next case, Duncombe v. Barfresh Food Group, Inc., Case No. B308385 (2d Dist., Div. 2 May 31, 2022) (unpublished), demonstrates an important lesson:  where you obtain a significantly diminished fee award at the trial court level,

Laffey Matrix, Reasonableness Of Fees: D.C. District Judge Refuses To Sign Off On Settlement Incorporating Unreasonable Fee Award To Pro Bono Attorneys When Public Fisc Bears The Burden

Cases: Laffey Matrix, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

$206,500.50 In Fees Agreed To By Plaintiffs And DOJ, But District Judge Found $82,562.50 To Be The Reasonable Amount.             Dimaio v. Wolf, Civil Case No. 20-445 (RJL) (D.D.C.) [Nov. 17, 2020 Memorandum Opn., Dkt. #30] is an interesting decision where U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon refused to incorporate a settlement agreement containing an

Laffey Matrix: D.C. Circuit Court Of Appeals, In 2-1 Opinion, Reverses District Judge’s Use Of USAO’s Updated Laffey Matrix Rather Than LSI Laffey Matrix In IDEA Fee Case

Cases: Laffey Matrix

USAO’s Updated Matrix Had Too Large Of A Community Pool For Fee Shifting-Purposes.             In DL v. District of Columbia, No. 18-7004 (D.C. Cir. May 21, 2019), the D.C. Circuit was faced with determining whether plaintiff was properly awarded attorney’s fees in an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) case after the district judge accepted

Scroll to Top