Cases: Appeal Sanctions

Appeal Sanctions: 2/4 DCA Imposes $21,366 Against Counsel Payable To Other Side And $8,500 Payable To Appellate Clerk For Frivolous Appeal

Cases: Appeal Sanctions

Appealing Nonappealable And Abuse Of Discretion Orders Led To The Result.             In Turner v. The Rule Co., Case Nos. B248667 et al. (2d Dist., Div. 4 July 10, 2019) (unpublished), an appeal was taken from several nonappealable orders and discovery sanctions/routine costs orders where abuse of discretion was the governing review standard.  The appellate […]

Appeal Sanctions, Arbitration: $55,764.40 Fee Award By An Arbitrator In Defective Car Case Could Not Be Reviewed On The Merits

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Arbitration

Appeal Sanctions Was Not Imposed For Frivolous Appeal Because Respondent’s Request Was Patently Excessive.             Justice Goethals, in Housen v. Ultimate Autoline, Case No. G055878 (4th Dist., Div. 3 June 10, 2019) (unpublished), reminds litigants and practitioners that the merits of arbitrator’s decisions are by and large not reviewable and that the arbitrator has limited

Appeal Sanctions, Fee Clause Interpretation, Section 1717: Absence Of Appropriate Fees Clause Doomed Prevailing Defendants’ Request For $621,328.34 In Attorney’s Fees

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Section 1717

However, Plaintiffs/Appellants And Their Appellate Counsel Sanctioned $44,654.64 For Frivolous Appeal.             In J.B.B. Investment Partners Ltd. v. Fair, Case Nos. A152877/A153698 (1st Dist., Div. 2 June 4, 2019) (unpublished), plaintiffs prevailed on a breach of contract count through a summary adjudication motion based on defendants’ breach of a settlement agreement and a lot of

Appeals Sanctions, SLAPP: After Affirming SLAPP Denial, Appellate Court Granted Frivolous Appeal Sanctions To Prevailing SLAPP Litigant As Well As Costs To Clerk For Working On The Appeal

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: SLAPP

Sanctions Award Mooted Any Need For Trial Court To Consider Appellate Fees For The Frivolous SLAPP Motion.             Workman v. Colichman, Case No. B285945 (2d Dist., Div. 4 April 2, 2019) (published) (posted April 3, 2019) is an interesting study in how an appellate court will attempt to avoid remand proceedings where a result is

Appeal Sanctions, Requests For Admission: Litigant’s Failure To Show Why Costs-Of-Proof Sanctions Were Erroneous Drew Appeal Sanctions Of $32,960.70

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Requests for Admission

We See A Growing Trend Of Appellate Sanctions In Recent Cases.             Appellant in Knudson v. Ryer, Case No. A149532 (1st Dist., Div. 5 Dec. 17, 2018) (unpublished) failed to show why RFA costs-of-proof sanctions under CCP § 2033.420 should be reversed based on deficient analysis in the appellate briefing. That led the DCA to

Appeal Sanctions: Third District Sanctions Appellant’s Attorney $10,000 Out Of Requested $22,550 In Fees And $6,000 To Appellate Clerk For Frivolous Appeal

Cases: Appeal Sanctions

Attorney Has Professional Obligation Not To Pursue A Frivolous Appeal.             The Third District, in Marriage of Daniliuc, Case No. C084293 (3d Dist. July 3, 2018) (unpublished), decided husband’s appeal of a fees award to his ex-wife was frivolous in nature. It decided that appellant’s husband should pay wife $10,000 out of a requested $22,550

Appeal Sanctions/Family Law:  $25,000 Family Code Section 271 Sanction Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Family Law

Appeal By Ex-Wife Found Frivolous, Which Carried $10,000 More In Sanctions.             Marriage of Wintermute and Soltan, Case No. G052397 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Apr. 9, 2018) (unpublished) was a situation where ex-wife appealed a Family Code section 271 sanction of $25,000 after an earlier appellate opinion disagreed with a critical assertion of ex-wife that

Appeal Sanctions/Deadlines:  Ninth Circuit Decides That Appeal Sanctions For Frivolous Appeal Under FRAP 38 Must Be Filed Under Time Limits For Filing Request For Appellate Attorney’s Fees Under Ninth Circuit Rule 39-1.6(a)

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Deadlines

With Respect To Double Costs For Frivolous Appeal, No Entitlement Unless Timely Costs Bill Filed.             In In re Westwood Plaza North (Erde v. Bodnar, et al.), No. 17-55655 (9th Cir. Apr. 9, 2018) (per curiam; published), the Ninth Circuit adopted a “bright line” rule for filing an appeal sanctions request for attorney’s fees under

Scroll to Top