Author name: Marc Alexander

Section 998: Prevailing Defendant’s §998 Offer For 1.6% Of The Damages Request By Plaintiff Was Unreasonable

Cases: Section 998

Denial of Defense Summary Judgment Motion And Trial Judge’s Remarks That Colorable Arguments Were Made For Interpretation Of An Easement Cemented The Result.             The defendant in 18131 Ventura Blvd., LLC v. 5223 Linley, LLC, Case No. B307958 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Dec. 14, 2021) (unpublished) won an easement interpretation dispute but only after the […]

Arbitration, Retainer Agreements: $192,000 Arbitration Award To Ex-Attorney Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Arbitration, Cases: Retainer Agreements

After MFAA Arbitration, Ex-Attorney Rightly Went To Contractual Arbitration; Argument That Block Billing Violates B&P Section 6148 Is Rejected Although Retainer Said Attorney Could Block Bill.             In Kling v. Horn, Case No. B305967 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Dec. 14, 2021) (unpublished), defendant ex-attorney, after engaging in a Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act (FAA) under which

Employment: Plaintiff Prevailing On 10% Of Primarily FEHA-Based Claims Properly Awarded $320,000 In Attorney’s Fees Out Of A Requested $2.1 Million Based On Overlitigation Of The Case, Limited Success, And Unexceptional Nature Of The Case

Cases: Employment

However, Denial Of Expert Fees Remanded Because Trial Judge May Have Believed He Had No Discretion To Award.             Herron v. County of Los Angeles, Case No. B295184 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Dec. 8, 2021) (unpublished) is an interesting case which shows how trial judges have wide discretion in awarding attorney’s fees of a reasonable

Costs: Fifth District Discusses A Myriad Of Costs Issues, Agreeing That Some Were Improperly Awarded But Others Were Properly Awarded

Cases: Costs

Costs Necessary And Reasonable To The Litigation Are Discretionary Award Calls By The Trial Judge.             In O’Neal v. Stanislaus County Employees’ Retirement Assn., Case No. F079887 (5th Dist. Dec. 8, 2021) (unpublished), non-prevailing plaintiffs appealed certain costs awarded to The Retirement Association and Stanislaus County.  The Fifth District concluded that some costs were improperly

POOF! Earlier Reversal of Judgment On Less Than All Causes of Action Required Reversal Of Subsequent Fees/Costs Award

Cases: POOF!

4/1 DCA So Rules In Unpublished Opinion.             In Cui v. Secured Capital Ltd. Partnership, Case No. D078538 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Dec. 2, 2021) (unpublished), a trial judge entered a $97,000 fees/costs award against a commercial tenant based on tort and premises liability claims against landlord and its real estate broker about the suitability

Employment: Even Though Wage Statement Penalty Award Is Reversed, $944,860 Fee Award To Prevailing Flight Attendants Sustained Upon Review

Cases: Employment

Penalties Will Be Recalculated And Likely Still Result In A Sizeable Penalty Award Despite Reversal, So Fee Award Was Not Disturbed.             In Gunther v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., Case No. D077313 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Dec. 1, 2021) (partially published; fee discussion published), Alaska Airlines was found to be in noncompliance with California state wage

Scroll to Top