Author name: Marc Alexander

Trespass: CCP § 1021.9 Fee Granting Statute Allows Appellate Fee Recovery

Cases: Trespass

Winning Plaintiff on Trespass Claim Entitled to More Fees On Appeal.      Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.9 has existed since 1986 and allows a prevailing plaintiff to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for prevailing in an action to recover personal or real property damages from a trespass upon lands either under cultivation or […]

Estoppel: Prevailing Party Determination In Anti-SLAPP Fee Award Proceeding Entitled To Direct Estoppel Effect In Subsequent Action

Cases: Estoppel, Cases: SLAPP

  Third District Gives Direct Collateral Estoppel Impact to Prior Ruling in Convoluted Real Estate Option Dispute.      Here is an interesting decision where the fee ruling in a prior SLAPP proceeding was given direct estoppel effect in a subsequent action. This is how it panned out.      South Sutter, LLC v. LJ Sutter Partners

Special Fee Shifting Statute: Chino Municipal Ordinance’s Fee Provision Supported Substantial Fee Award Against Verizon

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  $185,674.22 Fee Award and $12,829 Costs Award Sustained on Appeal.      Chino Municipal Code section 12.02.030 provides that any applicant (usually a telecommunications company obtaining an encroachment permit) failing to restore city or private property to the like or better condition after any encroachment damages “shall be liable for all costs to restore same

Section 998: $15,000/Fee Waiver Offer Was Accepted Before Revocation

Cases: Section 998

Result … 998 Offer Was Enforceable.      Gardenias v. Candreva, Case No. B223556 (2d Dist., Div. 6 Mar. 14, 2011) (unpublished) reminds us all that Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offers are guided by contract principles, especially in the area of acceptance and revocation.      In this one, defendant accepted a $15,000 § 998

Allocation: To Apportion Or Not To Apportion . . . . That Is The Question

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

If Trial Court Determines Common Facts Overlap Compensable and Noncompensable Claims for Fee Recovery, Usually Treated as Discretionary Exercise Upon Appellate Review.      In Conservatorship of McQueen (Taye v. Drumgoole), Case No. A126825 (1st Dist., Div. 4 Mar. 14, 2011) (unpublished), family attorney and other defendants were found liable for financial elder abuse, concealment, conversion,

Costs: Behr v. Redmond Now A Published Decision

Cases: Costs

  Genital Herpes Case With Costs Ruling Certified for Publication.      In our March 2, 2011 post, we discussed Behr v. Redmond, Case No. E04833 (4th Dist., Div. 2 March 2, 2011), a genital herpes case in which a costs award for expert witness fees was reversed because no CCP § 998 offer was proven

SLAPP Motion Ends Badly Because Court Refuses to Suffer Frivolous Appeal Gladly

Cases: SLAPP

SLAPP Defendant/Appellant Gets Smacked With Attorney’s Fees Twice      Our next case, City of Alhambra v. D’Ausilio, B220136 (2nd Dist. Div. 2 3/8/11) (unpublished), pitted Burke, Williams & Sorensen, and its client, the City of Alhambra, against The Petersen Law Firm, and its client, Robert D’Ausilio.        This lawsuit between Mr. D’Ausilio, a former employee

Scroll to Top