Author name: Marc Alexander

Estoppel/Section 1717: Contract Only Allowing For Recovery Of Costs, Not Specifying Attorney’s Fees, Did Not Give Rise To Fee Recovery

Cases: Estoppel, Cases: POOF!, Cases: Section 1717

  However, Prevailing Party Did Get Routine, Non-Fee Costs Based on Waiver/Inadequate Record on Appeal.      In Yamtob v. Alon, Case No. B247453 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Dec. 31, 2013) (unpublished), plaintiff lost a dispute to defendant/cross-complainant, who certainly obtained a net recovery judgment against plaintiff arising out of a diamond transaction. (Fitting over the

Appealability/Discovery/Sanctions: Ninth Circuit Decides That Non-Party’s Appeal Of Interlocutory Orders After Date Of Final Judgment Is Timely

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Discovery, Cases: Sanctions

  Appeals Court Affirms Denial of Sanctions But Remands for Cost-Shifting in Favor of Non-Party in FRCP 45 Subpoena Dispute.      The Ninth Circuit has ended the year with a “bang” as far as clarifying non-party appeal rights and the circumstances under which subpoena compliance cost shifting is mandatory under F.R.Civ.P. 45.      The opinion

Costs/Eminent Domain/Prevailing Party: Inverse Condemnation Plaintiffs Obtaining Earlier Reversal Of Defense Summary Judgment Entitled To Routine Appellate Costs

Cases: Costs, Cases: Eminent Domain, Cases: Prevailing Party

  However, Attorney’s Fees Award Was Premature Until Judgment or Settlement Obtained Under Inverse Condemnation Fee-Shifting Provision.      In an earlier appeal, Plaintiffs had obtained a reversal of a defense summary judgment in an inverse condemnation case, with the appellate court directing that the lower court consider a request for fees under Code of Civil

Probate: Order Directing Conservatee’s Mother To Pay One-Half Of Conservators’ Attorney’s Fees Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Probate

  Failure to Appeal November 2011 Order Was Fatal to Appellate Reconsideration.      Conservatee’s mother in Conservatorship of Gregory D., Case No. B245533 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Dec. 30, 2013) (unpublished) was ordered to pay one-half of the attorney’s fees of conservators’ counsel. She appealed, arguing that compensation for the attorney could only be charged

Year in Review 2013 – Part II

Year in Review

  Yearly Roundup: Mike and Marc’s Top-20 Plus Decisions in 2013 Roundup for tourists.  Fort Worth, Texas.  Carol M. Highsmith Collection.  Library of Congress. 2012.  Library of Congress. Part 2 of 2 – M & M’s Top 2013 Fee/Costs Decisions.      Here is the remainder of our top 2013 fee/costs decisions. However, if something comes

Year in Review 2013 – Part I

Year in Review

Yearly Roundup: Mike & Marc’s Top 20-Plus Decisions In 2013 Roundup for tourists.  Fort Worth, Texas.  Carol M. Highsmith Collection.  Library of Congress. 2012.  Library of Congress. Part 1 of 2 – M & M’s Top 2013 Fee/Costs Decisions.      It is that time of year where we provide our top fee/costs published decisions (with

Allocation/Consumer Statutes: Automobile Purchasers Not Effectively Rescinding Did Not Obtain Reversal Of Adverse Fee Recovery Under Two Consumer Statutes

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Consumer Statutes

  Work on $54,771.25 Fee Award Was Interrelated Under Automobile Sales Finance Act and Consumer Legal Remedies Act Claims.      Many consumer statutes allow for fee recovery to the prevailing party, such as the Automobile Sales Finance Act (ASFA, Civ. Code,, § 2983.4). Others allow for fee recovery, even against the consumer but only if

Scroll to Top