Author name: Marc Alexander

Judgment Enforcement: Judgment Creditor Gets Another Chance—Denial Of Fees Against Judgment Debtors’ Sureties Reversed On Appeal

Cases: Judgment Enforcement

  Sureties’ “Contractual Only” Argument Did Not Cut It On Appeal.      Okay, our followers, this one deals with judgment enforcement. If you are interested, stay tuned—because these are indeed arcane-oriented issues. If you are not, either watch some March Madness or still read just so you maybe put something away for later use in […]

Prevailing Party/Section 998/Section 1717: Plaintiffs In Sewer Easement Dispute With Nearby Defendants Not Entitled To Fees, While Defendants Properly Awarded $478,022 In Fees Under CCP § 998

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717, Cases: Section 998

  Result Was “Mixed” For Plaintiffs, While Plaintiffs Did Not Eclipse Defense 998 Offer.      The result in Smith v. Esmailzadeh, Case No. B239828 (2d Dist., Div. 8 Mar. 19, 2014) (unpublished) illustrates well our Mission Statement that "[a]ll too often attorney fees become the tail that wags the dog in litigation."  Deane Gardenhome Assn.

Employment: Former Employee Was Entitled To Award Of Fees Under Special Fee-Shifting Provision Involving Workplace Injury Where Workers Compensation Insurance Not In Place

Cases: Employment

  Fee Compensation for Work in Related Insurance Action No Abuse of Discretion.      Labor Code sections 3706/3709 have a mandatory fee-shifting provision in a case where a judgment is entered in a lawsuit for workplace injury under circumstances where the employer failed to obtain workers compensation insurance.      These special fee-shifting provisions were operative

Special Fee Shifting Statute: Felony Drunk Driving Civil Fee Shifting Statute Justified $65,970 Fee Award In Car Accident Case

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  Trial Court Did Not Abuse Discretion in Fixing Fee Award Even Though Both Drivers Were Intoxicated In Accident.      Dueling intoxicated car drivers had an interesting fee-shifting dispute in a civil case. What occurred in McBeath v. Bustos, Case No. B246122 (2d Dist., Div. 4 Mar. 18, 2014) (unpublished) was that plaintiff (who was

Probate/Prevailing Party/Section 1717/Settlement: Voluntary Dismissal Of Probate Petition To Confirm Settlement Properly Supported Denial Of Attorney’s Fees To Opposing Parties

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Probate, Cases: Section 1717, Cases: Settlement

  Santisas Drove the Result in this One.      In Berry v. Berry, Case No. D062914 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Mar. 18, 2014) (unpublished), one co-trustee/aligned other parties were not happy when a probate court denied their request for attorney’s fees under a settlement agreement fees clause after another co-trustee (a brother, of course) voluntarily

Lodestar/Multiplier/Settlement/Reasonableness Of Fees: Plaintiff Recovering $2.25 Million Dependent Abuse Verdict Also Recoups Additional $333,727.56 In Fees And $31,016.22 In Costs

Cases: Lodestar, Cases: Multipliers, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Settlement

  Much Less Awarded Than Requested $1.042-1.390 Million in Fees; Plaintiff Stipulated to Costs Reduction, With Modified Judgment Entered Accordingly.      This case is an interesting illustration of how lower courts will reduce an inflated fee request to calculate a lodestar as well as enforce a “high/low” stipulation that was silent with regard to fees/costs.

Section 998: Defense Cost Waiver Offer Was Reasonable After Plaintiff Had Case Resolved Adversely Through Two Summary Adjudication Motions

Cases: Section 998

  Cost Waiver Had Value—Over $60,000 In Costs.      Plaintiff brought suit after his vehicle collided with one of defendant’s light rail trains in Kurz v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Auth., Case No. H039163 (6th Dist. Mar. 18, 2014) (unpublished). Plaintiff’s case was resolved adversely based on two summary adjudication motions, with the defense then

Sanctions: Ninth Circuit Withdraws and Reissues Islamic Shura Opinion

Cases: Sanctions

  Rule 11 Sanctions Were Inappropriate When Rendered After Merits Decided And After Defendants Corrected Pleadings.      In our July 31, 2013 post, we discussed Islamic Shura Council v. FBI, 725 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir. 2013), where the Ninth Circuit reversed a Rule 11 sanctions order which was issued after a merits determination and after

In The News . . . New Jersey Bridge Flap Costing Fort Lee Borough Some Legal Fees And Top U.S. Law School Rankings Are Out

In The News

  A Bridge Too Far?  N.J. Bridge Probe Costing Some Legal Fees.      An article in McClatchy Newspapers reports that the N.J. George Washington Bridge closure embroiling N.J. Gov. Chris Christie’s administration in turmoil also has other fallouts. Not only is overtime being expended by public officials to investigate the matter, Fort Lee, N.J.’s council

Scroll to Top