Author name: Marc Alexander

In The News . . . . Original Lead Singer of “The Village People” Gets Fees And Expenses For Prevailing In Copyright Suit

Cases: Celebrities, In The News

  At Stake Were Rights In Songs, Including “YMCA.”     This one will stir up memories for a lot of you readers around the age of co-contributors Marc and Mike, probably like us watching “The Village People” perform on Saturday Night Live.     Victor Willis, the original lead singer of “The Village People,” prevailed in […]

Requests For Admissions: Ninth Circuit Affirms Denial Of Federal “Cost-Of-Proof” Sanctions Because Nonadmitting Party Reasonably Believed It Might Prevail On Antitrust Claims

Cases: Requests for Admission

  Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(2) Analog “Costs of Proof” Sanctions At Issue.     Although we have many times posted on California’s “cost-of-proof” sanctions provision under Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.420, the next case involves Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(2), which states that “[i]f a party fails to admit what is requested under Rule

IN THE NEWS . . . . $1.9 Million In Fees Assessed Against Plaintiff In Unsuccessful Patent Infringement Case And Dov Charney Loses Effort To Obtain Advancement Of Defense Fees In His Standstill Proceeding Fight Against American Apparel

Cases: Celebrities, In The News

  N.D. Cal. District Judge Orders Segan LLC To Pay $1.9 Million Under Octane Fitness/Highmark.     Last week, N.D. Cal. District Judge Vince Chhabria ordered Segan LLC to pay $1.9 million in fees to Zynga, Inc. for Segan’s filing of a “totally unreasonable” patent infringement suit over character icons that can interact with websites.  He

Homeowner Associations: Plaintiff Adjacent Owner Losing Challenge To Neighbor’s Plans Based On CC&Rs Upon Demurrer Properly Assessed With Fees

Cases: Homeowner Associations

    $89,387.50 Was Fee Recovery, With Trial Court Correctly Apportioning After Passage Of City Resolution.        Although technically not a HOA case, we post under this category because it involved an adjacent property owner in the City of Palm Desert suing another neighbor for having noncompliant construction plans under the HOA’s CC&Rs. The

In The News . . . . 2015 Lawsuit Climate Survey Is Out

In The News

  California Rates 47 Out of 50 At Bottom of List, With West Virginia Being No. 50.     The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, through a Harris Poll, has come out with its “2015 Lawsuit Climate Survey:  Ranking the States,” based on a national sampling of 1,203 in-house general counsel, senior litigators or attorneys,

Appealability/Costs/Deadlines/Section 1717: Trifecta Of Unpublished Decisions On Various Fee/Costs Issues

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Costs, Cases: Deadlines, Cases: Section 1717

  Costs—CEQA Record Preparation:  North County Advocates v. City of Carlsbad, Case No. D066488 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Sept. 10, 2015) (Unpublished).     In this first case, the appellate court reversed and remanded a costs award in favor of City in a costs award with respect to certain record preparation costs.  The takeaways here are

In The News . . . . Recent Orange County Register OpEd Article Details The Attorney’s Fees Recovery For Proposition 65 Over The Years

In The News

  Since 2000, About $150 Million—Two-Thirds Of Settlement Payments—Have Gone To Prosecuting Proposition 65 Attorneys.     Dr. Joseph Perrone, Chief Science Officer at the Center for Accountability in Science, has authored an OpEd article in the September 10, 2015 edition of The Orange County Register.  Among other things, he surveys the settlement payments made under

Deadlines/Section 998: Dismissed Defendants Under Rejected Joint 998 Offer Must Await Judgment Against Remaining Defendants Before Expert Fee Shifting Can Be Determined—998 Fee Shifting Determination Was Premature

Cases: Deadlines, Cases: Section 998

  Also, Service Of Judgment Electronically Extended The Time To File/Serve Costs Memorandum.     In a very detailed published decision, the Second District, Division 3 confronted two issues:  (1) whether a costs memorandum filed 17 days after electronic service of a notice of entry of judgment was timely, and (2) whether some dismissed defendants in

Scroll to Top