Author name: Marc Alexander

Costs: Routine Costs In State Court Case Initiated By Tribal Indians Not Immunized Under Sovereign Immunity Principles

Cases: Costs

  Tribe Brought Case, So That Distinguished Immunity Given In Other Circumstances.     California Valley Miwok Tribe v. California Gambling Control Commission, Case No. D068909 (4th Dist., Div. 1 June 16, 2016) (unpublished) involved an Indian tribe which suffered an adverse routine costs ruling against it and in favor of the Commission in a case […]

Arbitration, Costs: Ninth Circuit Addresses What Happens To Litigation Stay When Party Cannot Afford To Pay Ongoing Costs Of Compelled Arbitration

Cases: Arbitration, Cases: Costs

Does A Court Stay On Litigation Get Lifted When A Party Is Unable To Pay Ongoing Costs Of An Arbitration?      On June 15, 2016, Co-contributor Marc posted in the California Mediation and Arbitration blog about  Tillman v. Rheingold Firm, No. 13-56624 (9th Cir. 6/15/16), a Ninth Circuit Case addressing what happens to a district

Deadlines/Allocation: Work On Contract/Negligence Claims Were Intertwined, Justifying Recovery Of $91,819.58 In Fees In $39,335 Compensatory Award Case To Contractor As Against Property Owner

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Deadlines

  Appeal Was Timely, Given That Judgment Appeal Swept In Later Order Fixing Fees.     In Ducoing Enterprises, Inc. v. Patriot Paving, Inc., Case No. G051582 (4th Dist., Div. 3 June 15, 2016) (unpublished), a 3-0 decision authored by Justice Fybel, contractor won a $39,335 compensatory award against property owner in a complaint and a

Intellectual Property: SCOTUS Clarifies Factors For Discretion In Awarding Fees Under Copyright Act’s Fee-Shifting Statute

Cases: Intellectual Property, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  17 U.S.C. § 505 Was At Issue—Objective Reasonableness Plus Other Factors Should Be Weighed.     Justice Kagan, for a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court, clarified the factors to be weighed for purposes of discretionarily awarding attorney’s fees to a prevailing party under 17 U.S.C. § 505, the Copyright Act’s fee-shifting statute.     In Kirtsaeng dba

Civil Rights: Third Time Is The Charm—Defense Obtains $78,618 In Fees Against Unsuccessful FEHA Plaintiff Based On Fact Claims Were Frivolous

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Employment

  Defense Lost Two 128.7 Prior Sanctions Requests, But Got It On The Third Try, Doing Some Nice Things As Far As Amount Requested.     Dzhanikyan v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., Case No. B261113 (2d Dist., Div. 8 June 15, 2016) (unpublished) is a nice illustration of how good defense thinking and tenacity can produce

Prevailing Party/Section 1717: Bank Winning $65 Million Verdict Not Entitled To Prevailing Party Fees Against Borrower

Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

  Bank Wanted To Obtain Custodial Deposit Account Priority On Injunctive Claim, But Did Not Achieve Main Objective By Losing Lien Priority Issue.     Courts will focus on who pragmatically “won” as far as determining the prevailing party under Civil Code section 1717.  The next case well illustrates this principle.     In Wells Fargo Bank,

Homeowner Associations: Successor Property Owner Win In Homeowner Assessment Foreclosure Battle Did Not Entitle Owner To Fees Under Davis-Stirling Act Or CC&Rs

Cases: Homeowner Associations

  Nothing in Davis-Stirling Act or CC&Rs Indicated It Applied To Remote Third Parties.     In Multani v. APB Properties, Case Nos. B260610/B265172 (2d Dist., Div. 7 June 13, 2016) (unpublished), plaintiff HOA were embroiled in a protracted battle against the HOA and successor property owners of the condominiums regarding the propriety of an assessment

SLAPP: CBRE Suit Alleging Recovery Of Litigation Expenses Under Indemnity Agreements Were Private Disputes Properly Held Not SLAPPed

Cases: SLAPP

  Conduct Arising Out Of Contractual Relationship, Not Protected Activities, Involved.     In CBRE, Inc. v. Mission Viejo Gateway, Inc., Case No. B255934 (2d Dist., Div. 7 June 13, 2016) (unpublished), CBRE sued a defendant in a commercial property dispute to recover a lost commission and litigation expenses based on contractual/equitable indemnity principles, seeking to

Intellectual Property: SCOTUS Looks To Attorney’s Fees Flexibility Under Octane Fitness/Highmark In Determining Standards For Treble Damages Of Awards In Exceptional Patent Cases

Cases: Intellectual Property

  Flexibility, Not Rigid Tests, Is The Guiding Rule.      Flexibility.  Contortionist in tuxedo jacket, top hat, and tights performing surrounded by other performing contortionists.  c1892.  Library of Congress.      In the dual cases of Octane Fitness/Highmark, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a very flexible “under the circumstances” test for awarding attorney’s fees under a

In The News . . . . S.D.N.Y. Judge Awards $400,000 In Fees To Sony After Concluding Rival’s Copyright Suit Was Based On Fake Evidence

In The News

  Case Involved Shakira’s Song “Loca Con Su Tiguere”; Sony Had Asked For $688,000 In Fees.      This case involved some real twists. After provisionally finding copyright infringement liability in plaintiff’s favor with respect to Shakira’s song “Loca Con Su Tiguere,” U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein (S.D.N.Y.) held an evidentiary hearing and found that

Scroll to Top