Section 1717: Simply Because A Fee Retention Was A Company Obligation, Does Not Mean It Might Not Be Recoverable

California Caselaw Dictated The Result.

            Legendary Builders v. Grovewood Properties, Case Nos. B297299 et al. (2d Dist., Div. 4 Oct. 5, 2021) (unpublished), although a convoluted opinion, stresses a lesson we have posted on under Civil Code section 1717—“incurred” is a term of art and can encompass pro bono, reduced efforts, and non-business compensation efforts as long as a client potentially was on the hook for fees or engaged the attorney to do the work. 

Scroll to Top