Sanctions: Sanctions For Missing A Final Status Conference Were Appropriate, But Had To Be Reduced For Calibration To The Actual Expenses For the Missed FSC

No Huge Dispute, But Appellate Court Only Awarded Sanctions For Direct Expenses Relating To the FSC Violation.

Steele v. Paulee Body Shop, Inc., Case No. B344258 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Jan. 30, 2026) (unpublished) shows how a sanctions request needs to be calibrated to expenses incurred on the actual violation, not ancillary expenses which are claimed by the prevailing party.

There, it was undisputed a party missed an initial Final Status Conference appearance.  If the expenses for that were considered, they totaled $2,430.  However, the other side claimed more, $13,770—which was awarded—for certain subsidiary costs.  The 2/3 DA reversed and reduced the sanctions to $2,430.  It found non-compensable these items not directly tethered for the missed FSC violation: (1) costs incurred to file joint trial documents which were timely filed and agreed to by the offending party; and (2) certain subsequent normal course litigation appearances stemming from the on-going litigation.  So, to be clear, the $2,430 was awarded as sanctions and the matter was put to an end by the DCA—with no appellate costs awarded to either side.

Scroll to Top