Texas Anti-SLAPP Motion Is The Basis For The Fee Recovery. We can tell you that U.S. District Judge S. James Otero of the Central District of California decided to grant an anti-SLAPP motion in favor of now President Donald Trump in the defamation case brought against him by Stormy Daniels. He primarily found that […]
This Amount Was Reduction From $20 Million In Fees Expended And A Slice From The EAJA Lodestar Of $4.515 Million. Who says that class actions cannot have some happy endings in terms of the fee recoveries being reduced responsibly in public interest cases? The fee recovery result in Vietnam Veterans of America v. CIA,
NALFA and LAW360 Dub The Results As Surprising. Clio, a Canadian company that provides cloud-based practice management for firms, has presented a recent Legal Trends Report released Thursday last week with some very interesting findings, which some websites (NALFA and Law36) find to be surprising—as do we. Based on a survey of 70,000
Total May Soar To $34.5 Million Based On Some “Pipeline” Contracts to Law Firms As reported by Crain’s Detroit Business in a September 2, 2018 post, the State of Michigan already has spent $26.5 million in fees paid to private law firms in civil and criminal cases arising out of the Flint, Michigan water crisis.
She Awards 27% Of The Percentage Of Recovery, Lower Than What Class Counsel Wanted But Better Than The Fee Reduction Suggested By A Special Master. In past posts (February 9, 2018 and April 28, 2018 ), we did describe U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh’s frustration with the fee submissions by class counsel in the Anthem
Reduction Was Due To Inflated Hourly Rates And Failure To Provide Breakdown Of Fees. Although we are going by public reports of this decision, it is a reminder to be candid in fee submissions and follow a court’s directives to provide allocations/breakdown of fees in fee petition/motion proceedings. Catholic Benefits Association LCA v.
Four Florida Judges Relieved That The Final Chapter Has Come To A Close. This next story is truly a saga stemming out of the Florida “Engle progeny litigation,” as reported in a July 25, 2018 Reuters post by Alison Frankel which we now summarize. The Engle progeny litigation stemmed from a long-ago Florida
Seventh Circuit So Decides, Also Resolving Appealability Issue And Rejecting That An Objector Should Be Awarded Fees. In Birchmeier v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., Nos. 17-1626 et al. (7th Cir. July 24, 2018) (published), the Seventh Circuit was reviewing the propriety of awarding class counsel fees on a “sliding scale” approach by which it
Factual Reasonableness Was Conceded By Defense, And Legal Issue Was Novel Such That Fee Recovery Was Unwarranted. Although we generally post on California cases, readers will notice that we do post on non-California federal cases of interest. Here is one of these cases emanating from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (a federal appellate
District Judge Did Not Have To Adopt Reasonable Fee Award Position Of The Defense, But Could Reduce The Request Even More. USA ex rel. Palmer v C&D Technologies, Inc., No. 17-2350 (3d Cir. July 17, 2018) (precedential/published) involved a False Claims Act relator’s request for $3,113,530.50 in attorney’s fees under a prevailing party fee-shifting
