Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

Reasonableness of Fees, Special Fee Shifting Statutes, Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees:  $33,712.91 Fee Award To Prevailing Party Neighbor Was Affirmed In A Complicated Civil Harassment Matter

Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

$650 Hourly Rate For 15-Year Attorney And $450 For A Paralegal Were Found Reasonable In A Contentious Santa Clara County Case. Two neighbors had very bad experiences with each other, with one neighbor obtaining a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) and being awarded $33,712.91 in prevailing party attorney’s fees under CCP § 527.6 against the […]

Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: Where Prevailing Party Landlord Provided A Less Redacted Abstract Of Time Spent On The Case, That Substantiation Supported A Lower Court’s Award Of $94,344 In Fees

Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

Prevailing Party Voluntarily Lowered Its Fee Request Down From $142,842. Prevailing landlord was given a second chance when the lower court observed that billing substantiation was severely redacted and post-judgment work had been included in 2503 Haste Street Owner, LLC v. FanX, Inc., Case No A170902 (1st Dist., Div. 5 Dec. 19, 2025) (unpublished).  What

Discovery, Substantiation Of Fees:  4/3 DCA Decides That Appellate Fees For Upholding Inspection Demand Discovery Sanctions Are Authorized Fee-Shifting

Cases: Discovery, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

However, The Appellate Court Reduces Fees A Bit For Fees On Fees Work By A Higher Billing Attorney And Cautions That The Real Rate Report Has To Be Used With Precision. In Baer v. Tedder, Case Nos. G063642 et al. (4th Dist., Div. 3 Nov. 10, 2025) (published), the appellate court held that appellate fees

Probate, Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: Removed Trustee’s Failure To Challenge Fee Entitlement Under Judgment Affirmed In A Prior Appeal Also Disposed Of Same Challenge In A Second Appeal

Cases: Probate, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

However, The Lower Court Did Reduce The Fee Request Because of Unusually Redacted Time Entries.                The Fifth District, in Trunick v. Calloway, Case No. F086766 (5th Dist. June 11, 2025) (unpublished), affirmed an award of attorney’s fees to a beneficiary who was instrumental in removing co-trustees in a probate dispute.  In earlier proceedings, the

Reasonableness Of Fees, SLAPP, Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: Successful SLAPPing Defendant Entitled To An Award Of $48,790 In Fees And $1,574.60 In Costs

Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: SLAPP, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

Winning Defendant Did Something Smart:  After SLAPP Motion Granted, Offered To Stipulate To A Much Lower Fees And Costs Award, Rejected By Plaintiff.                When it comes to the reasonableness of a fee award, we have posted on situations where the prevailing party offered to stipulate to a lower fees/costs award and then obtained a

Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: Failure To Follow Local District Court Rule On Pre-Motion Meet And Confer Requirements Can Cost A Prevailing Plaintiff Or The Litigant’s Counsel The Right To Fees

Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

Ninth Circuit Affirmed District Judge’s Denial Of Fees For Failure To Meet And Confer For Purposes Of Seeing If Fee Dispute Could Be Resolved.                District court local rules have the “force of law.”  Prevailing plaintiff’s counsel learned that all too well, with his failure to follow one resulting in a complete denial of a

Eminent Domain, Reasonableness of Fees, Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: Unreasonable Demands And Lack Of Substantiation Caused A Substantial Fee Request Haircut

Cases: Eminent Domain, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

Plaintiff Wanted $1.942 Million; However, Trial Court Properly Awarded Only $360,438.45 In Fees. [U.S. Army induction center, ca. 1942]. Getting haircuts. CA 1942. Library of Congress                This next case illustrates how fee requests need to be reasonable and supported by proper substantiation.  If not, the litigant will get a sizable “haircut,” which is exactly

Trade Secrets, Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: One Defendant Obtains Fee Award Of $254,147.40 Under Trade Secrets Fee Shifting Statute, While Another Defendant Denied Fees

Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: Trade Secrets

Other Defendant Denied Fees For Not Providing Sufficient Substantiation Of Claimed Fees.             In Environmental Logistics, Inc. v. Hayward, Case No. D080515, and Environmental Logistics, Inc. v. Tabush, Case No. D080516 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Aug. 25, 2023) (unpublished), two companion cases, Plaintiffs sued multiple defendants, including three former employees, for interference and trade secret

Block Billing, Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: Where Attorney’s Fee Request Was Modest, An Attorney In A Firm Can Substantiate His Firm’s Fees And Block Billing Was Not An Issue Where Fee Request Was Not Substantial

Cases: Block Billing, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

However, Block Billing Is A Problem In A Complex Case With Multiple Billing Attorneys Involved.             In Minser v. Collect Access, LLC, Case Nos. B318325/B321996 (2d Dist., Div. 1 May 24, 2023) (unpublished), plaintiff prevailed on a Rosenthal Act debt collector claim, which has a fee shifting provision under Civil Code section 1788.30(c).  The lower

Family Law, Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: Attorney Fee Award To Husband Prevailing In Restraining Order Matter Reversed Due To Lack Of Information Necessary For Trial Court To Perform A Lodestar Calculation

Cases: Family Law, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

An Unsworn Statement Made By Husband’s Counsel, As To His Hourly Rate And Time Spent Working On The Case, Did Not Support The Trial Court’s Lodestar Calculation.             In Marriage of Halamandaris, Case No. E076933 (4th Dist., Div. 2 October 10, 2022) (unpublished), husband defeated wife’s attempt to obtain a restraining order under the Domestic

Scroll to Top