Cases: SLAPP

  Shoen v. Vista Lanai Apts. Partnership, Case No. B260726 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Aug. 5, 2015) (unpublished).     An appeal of a SLAPP grant and a subsequent order granting SLAPP fees to the prevailing was dismissed.  The appeal of the SLAPP grant was untimely, with losing plaintiffs going 30 days past the jurisdictional 180-day […]

  However, Lower Court Lacks Jurisdiction To Enter Merits Judgments Following Voluntary Dismissal.     McVeigh v. Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, Inc. (MacLeod), Case No G049461 (4th Dist., Div. 3 May 11, 2015) (unpublished) is somewhat a study into subject matter jurisdiction in the SLAPP context, involving convoluted proceedings which really did not change

  On Remand, Trial Judge Can Try To Correct.      In the SLAPP area, a trial judge can award attorney’s fees against a party losing a SLAPP motion if the motion is deemed to be frivolous. However, the frivolity determination has to meet certain standards under prior (now resurrected) CCP § 128.5.      The order

  Plaintiff’s Appeal of SLAPP Grant Against Another Defendant Did Not Stay Fee Proceedings and Lack of Reporter’s Transcript Showed No Abuse of Discretion In Fee Amount Awarded.     In Shankar v. Shoffner, Case No. B255399 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Apr. 29, 2015) (unpublished), a plaintiff who was SLAPPed for bringing a malicious prosecution claim

  Also, Fee Award Was Fairly Modest.      Plaintiff lost a SLAPP motion to the defense, which gave rise to the mandatory fee-shifting attorney’s fees statutory provision codified in Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16(c)(1). The trial court granted defendant $7,122.50 in fees and $806 in costs.      Plaintiff’s appeal in Darling v. Pentecost, Case

  However, On Remand, Fee Claimant Can Try For Them Under Another Statute.      If a defendant loses a SLAPP motion, fees can only be assessed against a defendant (and not defense counsel) if findings are made that the motion was frivolous/bad faith under CCP § 128.5 (which used to be dead, but has made