Cases: SLAPP

SLAPP: Defendants Losing Frivolous SLAPP Motion Socked With Roughly $101,000 In Attorney’s Fees Awarded To Successfully Opposing Plaintiff

Cases: SLAPP

Dispute Was Over Ownership Of Purebred Australian Terriers.   Australian Terrier Puppy.  Wikipedia.  Author:  Jay22897.  Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.       Dogs, palm trees, ocean views, and invading vegetation seem to draw the rankle of many a litigant, often leading to contentious suits where one side wins or no one prevails—all meaning that […]

SLAPP Two-Fer: Notice Of Appeal Not Mentioning SLAPP Fee Recovery Deprived Appellate Court Of Jurisdiction And Lower Court Did Not Abuse Discretion By Denying Fee Recovery To Plaintiff Defeating SLAPP Motion

Cases: SLAPP

  Shoen v. Vista Lanai Apts. Partnership, Case No. B260726 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Aug. 5, 2015) (unpublished).     An appeal of a SLAPP grant and a subsequent order granting SLAPP fees to the prevailing was dismissed.  The appeal of the SLAPP grant was untimely, with losing plaintiffs going 30 days past the jurisdictional 180-day

SLAPP: Trial Court Does Have Jurisdiction To Rule On SLAPP Fees After Dismissal

Cases: SLAPP

  However, Lower Court Lacks Jurisdiction To Enter Merits Judgments Following Voluntary Dismissal.     McVeigh v. Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, Inc. (MacLeod), Case No G049461 (4th Dist., Div. 3 May 11, 2015) (unpublished) is somewhat a study into subject matter jurisdiction in the SLAPP context, involving convoluted proceedings which really did not change

SLAPP: Mandatory Fee-Shifting Statute In Favor Of Defense Does Not Require Consideration Of Financial Condition Of Losing Plaintiff

Cases: SLAPP

  Also, Fee Award Was Fairly Modest.      Plaintiff lost a SLAPP motion to the defense, which gave rise to the mandatory fee-shifting attorney’s fees statutory provision codified in Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16(c)(1). The trial court granted defendant $7,122.50 in fees and $806 in costs.      Plaintiff’s appeal in Darling v. Pentecost, Case

SLAPP, Substantiation Of Fees: $33,265 In Fees To Two Prevailing Attorney Defendants Sustained On Appeal

Cases: SLAPP, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

  No Trope Problem; Trial Judge Did Reduce Requests; Attorney Declaration Of Hours Expended Suffices.      In Shames v. Peffer, Case No. D065737 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Mar. 25, 2015) (unpublished), plaintiff sued two defendant attorneys personally (not their firm) for libel/prospective economic advantage interference, but was SLAPPed even though the law firm where each

Appealability, SLAPP: Appeal Of Subsequent Fee Order, After SLAPP Grant Dismissing Action, Was Not Independently Appealable

Cases: Appealability, Cases: SLAPP

  Only Appealable For Judgment Of Dismissal, Disagreeing With Third District Precedent.      Although we do not “weigh in” on many decisions, the issue in this case may be destined for California Supreme Court review—given that the jurisprudence is this area is conflicting or (at least) confusing.      The issue, boiled down, deals with appealability—when

Judgment Enforcement, SLAPP: Attorney’s Fees Incurred In Enforcement Of SLAPP Fee Recovery Are Recoverable Costs Under CCP § 685.040

Cases: Judgment Enforcement, Cases: SLAPP

  Plain Meaning of Statute and California Supreme Court Precedent So Dictated.      In a prior companion appeal, York v. Strong, Case No. G049512 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Mar. 10, 2015) (unpublished), one attorney appealed a SLAPP fee recovery of $21,840 assessed against him when another attorney “SLAPPed” his claim arising from competing claims to

Scroll to Top