Cases: Sanctions

Sanctions: $125,690.56 Section 128.5 Sanctions Order Against Plaintiff’s Class Action Attorneys, Hinged On Settlement Agreement Release Language, Reversed As A Matter Of Law

Cases: Sanctions

Also, Order Denying Sanctions Request Is Not Appealable In Itself, With A Writ Or Appeal After Final Judgment Being The Ways To Challenge Such An Order.             Plaintiff’s class action attorneys, who represented a client arising out of spiraling events from a minor alleged debt by Capital One, were sanctioned $125,690.56 under CCP § 128.5 […]

Sanctions: Ninth Circuit Reverses Six Sanctions Imposed By District Court Under Inherent Authority, Rather Than Pursuant To Statute Or Rule, Against Prevailing Plaintiff For Disobeying A Discovery Order

Cases: Sanctions

The District Court Did Not Have The Benefit Of The Goodyear Tire Decision At The Time It Issued The Sanctions Order So A Remand Was In Order.             America Unites For Kids v. Rousseau, Case No. 16-56390 (9th Cir. January 22, 2021) (published), has a nice discussion on the procedural requirements and substantive limitations

Discovery, Sanctions: $6,954.95 Deposition Discovery Sanctions Award Was Appealable Even Though It Was Payable To Two Different Recipients, While $1,750 Sanctions Award Was Not Appealable

Cases: Discovery, Cases: Sanctions

However, The Merits Appeal Of The $6,954.95 Sanctions Award Did Not Succeed Based On Failure To Appreciate The Nature Of The Deposition Process.             Burke v. Newport-Mesa Unified School Dist., Case No. G058732 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Jan. 21, 2021) (unpublished), authored by Justice Goethals of our local Santa Ana appellate court, has some interesting

Appealability, Discovery, Sanctions: Appeal Of Terminating Sanctions Does Not Necessarily Also Encompass Challenge To Discovery Monetary Sanctions

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Discovery, Cases: Sanctions

2/7 DCA Implicitly Suggests Disagreement With Other Decisions, But Finds Two Sanctions Orders Were Not Intertwined.             OK, for you folks who love technical appealability issues, Taylor v. Forde, Case No. B298957 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Jan. 20, 2021) (unpublished), may be your forte, especially when it comes to appealability of discovery terminating sanctions orders

Family Law, Sanctions: Trial Court’s Award To Attorney Husband Of $800 In Attorney Fees In The Nature Of Sanctions Under Section 271 Reversed As A Matter Of Law

Cases: Family Law, Cases: Sanctions

Self-Represented Attorney Husband Incurred No Fees To Which The Section 271 Sanctions Must Be Tethered.             Family Code § 271, subdivision (a), provides that “the court may base an award of attorney’s fees and costs on the extent to which the conduct of each party or attorney furthers or frustrates the policy of the law

Sanctions: Trial Judge’s Failure To Expressly Specify The Sanctionable Conduct Required A Remand And Do-Over

Cases: Sanctions

Appellate Court Found Basis Existed For Sanctions, But Required Greater Clarity Especially Given That Bar Discipline Could Be At Issue.             An attorney in American Express Bank FSB v. Singh (Abdeljawad), Case No. E074042 (4th Dist., Div. 2 Dec. 30, 2020) (unpublished) violated a court order to personally appear at a Fall 2019 hearing to

Discovery, Sanctions: Monetary Discovery Sanctions Improperly Denied Against Litigants Under “Unjust” Exception Simply Because Other Terminating Sanctions Granted Previously

Cases: Discovery, Cases: Sanctions

However, Litigant’s Attorneys Were Not Subject To Sanctions Because No Evidence Indicated The Attorneys Advised The Clients To Engage In The Discovery Violations.             Litigators need to read the Sixth District’s recent decision in Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings, Case Nos. H042715 et al. (6th Dist. Dec. 2, 2020) (published) on sanctions available for

Bankruptcy Efforts, Sanctions: Ex-Partners In State Court Lawsuit Against Debtor With A Discharge Injunction Properly Not Sanctioned For Contempt Fees When They Had An Objective Belief The Debtor Had Returned To The Partnership State Court Dispute

Cases: Bankruptcy Efforts, Cases: Sanctions

Ninth Circuit Came To The Same Result, Even Under An Objective Standard Although SCOTUS Sent The Case Back Based On Denying Contempt Fees Under A Less Stringent Good Faith Belief Standard.             On April 28, 2020, we posted on In re Taggart, a Ninth Circuit decision where two ex-partners in state court litigation against a

Sanctions: 2/3 DCA Affirms $16,111 In Discovery Sanctions Resulting From Attorney’s Violation Of Discovery Order For Which The Panel Overturned His Contempt Conviction

Cases: Sanctions

Misuse Of The Discovery Process Does Not Have To Be Willful Before Monetary Sanctions May Be Imposed, But Punishment For Contempt Rests Upon A Clear, Intentional Violation.             We previously discussed the next case in our February 24, 2017 post.  At that time, the 2/3 DCA had dismissed minor’s appeal from an order that

Sanctions: Attorney Convicted On 4 Counts Of Civil Contempt, Fined $3,600 And Ordered To Pay Opposing Party’s Attorney Fees And Costs Wins Reversal Of Fees/Costs Order And Has 3 Of 4 Civil Contempt Convictions Overturned

Cases: Sanctions

Attorney Fees/Costs Order Was Not Supported By Statute And The Proper “Unit Of Prosecution” For Attorney’s Conduct At A Fifteen Minute Settlement Conference Was A Single Count Of Contempt.             In Moore v. Superior Court, Case No. G058609 (4th Dist., Div. 3 November 16, 2020) (published), while representing a client at a fifteen minute

Scroll to Top