Allocation, Fee Clause Interpretation, Reasonableness Of Fees: Reducing Requested $1.36 Million Fee Award, By 25% To $943,028, Was No Abuse Of Discretion Based On $1.2 Million-Plus Recovery And Rejection Of Low Ball Defense Settlement Offer
Cases: Allocation, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Reasonableness of FeesTort Claim Defense Fees On An Unsuccessful Cross-Complaint Were Interrelated, Thus No Allocation Required; Prevailing Party Clause In Lease Applied So As To Allow Fee Recovery In Broker’s Favor. Water Court, LLC v. Adams Wine Group, LLC, Case No. B290799 (2d Dist., Div. 6 Feb. 25, 2020) (lead appeal; unpublished) is an example of […]
