Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

Fee Clause Interpretation: “Incorporation By Reference” Of An Exhibit With A Fees Clause Into Contract Gave Rise To Fee Entitlement

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

       Demari v. Desert Oasis Mobile Estates, Case No. F064419 (5th Dist. Mar. 19, 2013) (unpublished) was a situation where plaintiff sued defendants for breach of contract and was defensed through a demurrer which was sustained without leave to amend. Then, the lower court granted attorney’s fees in favor of defendants as prevailing parties. […]

Appealability/Fee Clause Interpretation/Lodestar/Reasonableness Of Fees/SLAPP: Appellate Trifecta On Fee Issues

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Lodestar, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees, Cases: SLAPP

  Marathon Funding, LLC v. Paramount Pictures, Case No. B240723 (2d Dist., Div. 8 Mar. 4, 2013) (Unpublished).      In this first one, defendant won more than $690,548.90 in posttrial attorney’s fees under an investment agreement providing fees to the winner “in any action, suit, or other proceeding [that] is instituted concerning or arising out

Fee Clause Interpretation/Section 1717: “Action” Language In Written Easement Agreement Fees Clause Encompassed Both The Complaint Or An Answer Raising A Successful Defense

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Section 1717

  Appellate Court Reverses Fees Denial Order, Siding With Justice Armstrong’s Interpretation of “Action” in Gil.      We now have a split of intermediate appellate thinking on whether “action” encompasses just the complaint or also a “defense” in an answer. Exxess Electronizz v. Heger Realty Corp., 64 Cal.App.4th 698 (1998) and Gil v. Mansano, 121

Fee Clause Interpretation/Section 1717: Third-Party Beneficiaries Win Fee Recovery Under Broadly Worded Prevailing Party Clause

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Section 1717

  Clause Language and Negotiation of Settlement Demonstrated Prevailing Parties Were Third Party Beneficiaries      In Homeport Ins. Services, Inc. v. Lundy, Case No. B238296 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Jan. 28, 2013) (unpublished), an injured longshoreman settled a worker’s compensation claim against SSA (terminal associated entities) and a personal injury action against City of Long

Fee Clause Interpretation: Broadly Worded Fee Clause Under Joint Venture Agreement Allowed Fee Recovery By Administrator Of Partner’s Estate

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

       In Mako Fund, Inc. v. Perrone, Case No. B238048 (2d Dist., Div. 1 Nov. 30, 2012) (unpublished), two litigants sued each other and one obtained a judgment for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs of suit, and attorney’s fees. After winner found out that loser lacked assets to satisfy the judgment, it moved to

Fee Clause Interpretation: Clause Allowing For Recovery Of “Legal Expenses” Sensibly Encompassed Recovery Of Attorney’s Fees

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

  Lower Court Denial Based on Contrary Interpretation Reversed.      The lower court in Dickerson Associates v. ShinYoung 3670, LLC, Case No. B232074 (2d Dist., Div. 2 Nov. 14, 2012) (unpublished) denied an attorney’s fees award to a prevailing party under a contractual fees clause allowing recovery for “legal expenses.” The trial judge apparently believed

Fee Clause Interpretation/Section 1717: Broadly Worded Fee Clauses In Loan Documents And Guaranties Allowed Bank Entitlement To Substantial Fee Recovery

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Section 1717

  “Touching Upon” Language Found Especially Persuasive.      Case law under Civil Code section 1717 allows for recovery of fees on a contract claim, and is augment by cases applying Code of Civil Procedure section 1021 if the contractual fees clauses are broad enough to encompass tort claims. Bank, a prevailing cross-defendant below on certain

Arbitration/Fee Clause Interpretation/Prevailing Party: Dismissed Arbitration Still Meant Litigant Prevailed, Santisas Notwithstanding

Cases: Arbitration, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Prevailing Party

  Party Getting Dismissed Arbitration Proceeding Entitled to Fees.      Lakeside Club Villas, Inc. v. LB Property Mgt., Inc., Case No. B236001 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Oct. 16, 2012) (unpublished) is an interesting case showing how the breadth of a fees clause awarding fees/costs in an arbitration will garner a litigant a fee recovery, even

Costs/Fee Clause Interpretation/Section 1717: Quantum Meruit Is Not “On A Contract” Under Section 1717 And Prevailing Attorney Entitled To Routine Costs, But Not Fees Under Ambiguous Fees Clause

Cases: Costs, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Quantum Meruit, Cases: Section 1717

       In Siciliano v. Singh, Case Nos. E052352/E053582 (4th Dist., Div. 2 Oct. 5, 2012) (unpublished), one attorney won quantum meruit fees based on a voided contingency fee agreement, with both client and attorney seeking recovery of attorney’s fees and costs (even though, ultimately, attorney did beat out–barely–a CCP § 998 offer once routine

Attorney’s Fees Trifecta: Fee Clause Interpretation, Family Law Child Order Fees, And SLAPP Fees Dominate In Trio Of Unpublished Decisions

Cases: Family Law, Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: SLAPP

  Mossman v. Naranjo, Case No. D059054 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Sept. 18, 2012) (Unpublished)–CAR Form Real Estate Contract Covers Fees Won For Real Property Nondisclosure Claims.      Plaintiffs/buyers won fraud-based claims for property nondisclosures from defendants/sellers, but defendants won the contract based claim. The lower court denied fees to both parties, finding no prevailing

Scroll to Top