Cases: Deadlines

Deadlines: Nonprevailing Parties’ Failure To File A Timely Motion To Tax Costs After Entry Of Voluntarily Dismissal Was Not Excused Under CCP § 473

Cases: Deadlines

Case Law Was Not Ambiguous That No Entry of Judgment Was Needed When The Court Clerk Served A Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal.             Tom v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Case No. B308200 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Jan. 19, 2022) (unpublished) should remind all litigators to timely file a motion to tax costs, even prematurely doing

Deadlines, SLAPP: SLAPP Defendants Must File A Formal Costs Memorandum Or Fee Motion After Plaintiff Voluntarily Dismisses Action In Order To Claim SLAPP Fees

Cases: Deadlines, Cases: SLAPP

Failure To File Was Dispositive To Majority Opinion; Dissent Believed That The Fee Entitlement Request In The SLAPP Motion Papers Properly Teed Up The Issue.             Over a dissent, a majority of an appellate court panel in Catlin Ins. Co., Inc. v. Danko Meredith Law Firm, Inc., Case No. A160358 (1st Dist., Div. 4 Jan.

Deadlines, Judgment Enforcement, SLAPP, Special Fee Shifting Statutes: Where Trial Court Correctly Determined Reimbursement Of Fees/Costs Sought By Prevailing SLAPP Defendant Were For Judgment Enforcement, Not Appellate Fees, Motion Was Timely Filed

Cases: Deadlines, Cases: Judgment Enforcement, Cases: SLAPP, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Distinction Between Enforcement Fees And Appellate Fees Set Forth In McQueen Governed.             In Laue v. Ortiz, Case No. H047475 (6th Dist., January 7, 2022) (unpublished), defendant successfully SLAPPed plaintiff’s complaint and was awarded fees and costs as mandated under Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16(c)(1) – the anti-SLAPP fee shifting provision.  After unsuccessfully appealing

Appealability, Costs, Deadlines: $10,800 Costs Recovery To Certain Defendants After Plaintiff Dismissed Case Without Prejudice And Refiled In Texas Was Not Erroneous

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Costs, Cases: Deadlines

4/3 DCA Sides With The View That A Costs Award Entered After A Voluntary, Without Prejudice Dismissal Is Appealable.             In Thomas v. St. Joseph Health System, Case No. G059408 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Oct. 20, 2021) (unpublished), plaintiff doctor sued certain health care defendants in Orange County Superior Court for interference/unfair competition.  Certain defendants

Appealability, Deadlines, Family Law: Ex-Husband’s Appeals Of Postjudgment Fee Orders Doomed By Untimeliness Of Appeal On One Order And Lack of Merit On The Other Two.

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Deadlines, Cases: Family Law

Pay Attention to Appellate Deadlines, If You Want To Preserve Challenges.             In Marriage of Mhanna and Hage, Case Nos. H045078 et al. (6th Dist. Sept. 24, 2021) (unpublished), ex-husband challenged three attorney fees orders: (1) a first order awarding fees to ex-wife under Family Code section 271 and 2030 to the tune of $80,000;

Deadlines: Where Reverse Validation Action Had A 30-Day Appeal Deadline, That Deadline Governed Fee Motion Filing Despite More General Lengthier Deadlines

Cases: Deadlines

CCP § 1021.5’s Fee Claimant Motion Was Untimely.             Sometimes, the context of a suit determines when a fee motion needs to be filed.  Central Delta Water Agency v. Dept. of Water Resources, Case Nos. C078249 et al. (3d Dist. Sept. 22, 2021) (published) reminds practitioners in a reverse validation case—even where more claims are

Deadlines, Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: Party Winning Usurious Note Dispute Was Properly Awarded $318,400.50 In Contractual Attorney’s Fees

Cases: Deadlines, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

Filing An Appeal Did Not Stay Fee Motion Determination Absent A Stipulation, With Petitioning Attorneys Doing A Commendable Job Of Supporting The Fee Request.             This next case, Korchemny v. Piterman, Case Nos. A155483 et al. (1st Dist., Div. 2 Aug. 27, 2021 [unpublished]; certified for publication on September 17, 2021), demonstrates how a winning

Scroll to Top