Allocation, Civil Rights, Costs: Apportionment Not Necessary If Claims Inextricably Intertwined And Routine Costs Against Losing Civil Rights Plaintiff Remanded For A Re-Do
Cases: Allocation, Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: CostsPainter v. Francis Realty, Inc., Case No. C078106 (3d Dist. Oct. 6, 2015) (Unpublished)—Allocation. After reversing the fee award and remanding to see if apportionment was required between tort and contract claims under Civil Code section 1717 (with only contract claims compensable under section 1717), the trial judge determined the tort and contract […]
