Denial Order Is Not Appealable, Only the Judgment Confirming the Award. The next case is a reminder to all that you must research what can and cannot be appealed when dealing with corrections to arbitration awards. The aggrieved plaintiff learned that all too well in the next decision we examine. Bader v. […]
Second District, Division 8 Does Find Procedural Issue Might Deserve Supreme Court Review, But Affirms Merits Awards. In Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. v. Bernard, Case No. B207865 (2d Dist., Div. 8 Feb. 22, 2010) (certified for publication), arbitration awards of $12.3 million for lost management fees and $6.7 million in attorney’s fees, costs, and
First District, Division 1 Addresses Claimed Conflict Between JAMS Rules and CCP Arbitration Correction Provision. Here is a decision that involves consideration of class action and arbitration crossover issues. Two attorneys deserving of attorney’s fees in a substantial class action settlement entered into an agreement among themselves on the allocation of fees, calling
One-Side Legal Costs and Fees Provision Was Part of the Problem Most cases we report about involve an award of attorney's fees, or the denial of an award. But we cast our net widely. In the next case, an arbitration provision was held to be procedurally and substantively unconscionable, in part because it had a
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1281.2 Is Interpreted to Require a Party Seeking to Compel Arbitration to Plead and Prove a Prior Demand for Arbitration Under the Parties’ Arbitration Agreement and a Refusal to Arbitrate Thereunder. In the next case, Homeowner Association successfully petitioned to arbitrate a dispute with a homeowner, only to have the
Second District, Division 3 Remands for Reconsideration of Fee Issues. Tenzera, Inc. v. Osterman, Case No. B211656 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Jan. 21, 2010) (unpublished) involved a hefty arbitration award of $426,047.72 in favor of homeowners and against contractor (a corporate entity) and against contractor’s principals (father and son), as well as an $181,000
Warburton Decision is a Companion to our December 28 Post on Lake v. Griffin, But in Inverse Fashion. In our December 28, 2009 post, we reviewed Lake v. Griffin, where the Fourth District, Division 1 held that a denial of a motion to compel arbitration in an ongoing case was not a "discrete proceeding"
Fourth District, Division 1 Reverses Fee Award in Case Involving Reggie Bush … And Clarifies Otay River Constructors in the Process. Here is one for all of you U.S.C. alumni or fans, involving civil litigation that impacts former collegiate football great Reggie Bush. The decision shows how the procedural context of a case can
Sixth District Likes Trial Court’s Rulings Across the Board on Fee Issues. In Exatron, Inc. DiFrancesco, Case No. H033094 (6th Dist. Dec. 9, 2009) (unpublished), plaintiff’s prior attorney’s fees and costs award from a contractual arbitration against defendant were affirmed in a prior appellate decision. Nine months later, plaintiff filed for supplemental fees
Lower Court Erred In Awarding $5,218.60 in Filing Fees, Motion Fees, and Registered Process Server Charges. In Meyers v. Fitzgerald, Case No. H032605 (6th Dist. Nov. 19, 2009) (unpublished), plaintiffs filed a complaint that was ordered to arbitration. The complaint was later dismissed without prejudice based on certain voluntarily actions taken by defendants. However,
