Arbitrator’s Failure to File Certificate Approving Out of State Attorney Until After Filing of the Favorable Arbitration Award Was Deemed Harmless Error. For those practitioners that are involved in arbitrations (and most litigators are in this day and age), here is an interesting case about approval of out of state attorneys and their […]
Declaratory Relief Action Denial Reversed re Class Action Fee Distribution. In Carder v. Patten, Faith & Sandford, Case No. B221940 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Oct. 12, 2010) (certified for publication), the appellate court reversed judgment entered against a plaintiff class action lawyer in a declaratory relief action he brought against other class action co-counsel
Second District, Division 5 Applies AAA Rules Invoked By Each Side’s Arbitration Demands. When you are reviewing a contract for fee exposure, make sure you focus carefully on the remedies and arbitration sections. If the arbitration section incorporates American Arbitration Association rules, litigants may have fee exposure from the express rules incorporation made by
Second District, Division 5 Finds Arbitral Discretion Prevails on Fee Award. In Youssefzadeh v. 740 S. Broadway Associates, LLC, Case No. B220726 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Sept. 30, 2010) (unpublished), two matters were ordered to arbitration pursuant to identical binding arbitration clauses in two different LLC operating agreements. The clauses were broad in nature,
August 31 was a day in which two decisions were issued by Courts of Appeal, both demonstrating the deference that trial and appellate courts will give to arbitration attorney’s fees awards. Miller v. Lifestyles Senior Housing Managers, Case No. C059843 (3d Dist. Aug. 31, 2010) (Unpublished). In the first one, plaintiff lost
Fourth District, Division 3 Honors Stipulation By Its Terms on Forfeiture of Appellate Rights. Appellate courts will enforce the bargains struck between parties, even when they involve waivers of fundamental rights (such as the right to appeal). That happened in the next case we discuss. In Fridman v. Beach Crest Villas Homeowners
Second District, Division 1 Enforces Procedural Aspects of Nonbinding Mandatory Fee Arbitration and Contractual Arbitration Enforcement Provisions. In Sands & Associates v. Juknavorian, Case No. B218019 (2d Dist., Div. 1 July 30, 2010) (unpublished), client initiated a nonbinding arbitration against law firm under the Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act after being disgruntled with law firm’s
First District, Division Two Nixes $450,000-Plus Fee Request of Widow. Aside from the fact that it involved an arbitration between the survivors of music legend Jerry Garcia, we knew this one would be good when the arbitrator started out his decision denying attorney’s fees to the widow this way: “On the issue of
Second District, Division 8, in Opinions by Justice Flier, Affirms Two Fee Awards, One For Appellate Work In a Civil Case and One in an Arbitration Context. #1: Moore v. Pro Value Properties, Inc., Case No. B216061 (2d Dist., Div. 8 July 6, 2010) (unpublished) In pro per plaintiffs/appellants challenged a $120,360.75 fee award
Fourth District, Division 1 Reverses Arbitration Fee Award on Public Policy Grounds on Appeal. Code of Civil Procedure section 1284.3(a) is a pro-consumer arbitration provision that states an arbitrator/neutral cannot administer an arbitration for a consumer in a way that makes the consumer responsible to pay attorney’s fees or costs if he/she is
