Author name: Marc Alexander

Family Law: $4,000 Needs-Based Fee Contribution Order Against Wife Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Family Law

Husband Provided Equivalent Judicial Council Information, With Wife Having the Better Standard of Living Based on Income From a “New Mate.”      Ex-wife in Buchanan v. Alhino, Case No. C072653 (3d Dist. June 17, 2014) (unpublished) appealed a family law order directing that she contribute $4,000 toward ex-husband’s attorney’s fees under the needs-based statutes (Family

Estoppel/Prevailing Party/Section 1717: Long-Standing Dispute Over L.A. Metro Red Line Subway Performance Looks Like It Is Winding To A Conclusion

Cases: Estoppel, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Section 1717

  Fee Exposure Frenzy Did Play Out on Appeal.      Tutor-Saliba-Perini J.V. v. L.A. County Metro. Transp. Auth., Case No. B232372 (2d Dist., Div. 7 June 16, 2014) (unpublished) ultimately came down to a situation of what party might obtain attorney’s fees in a two decades battle over compensation owed for work on the Los

POOF!/Retainer Agreement/Prevailing Party and Section 1717: Appellate Court’s Reversal of Fee Disgorgement Order Meant Remand Necessary To See Who Prevailed

Cases: POOF!, Cases: Prevailing Party, Cases: Retainer Agreements, Cases: Section 1717

  Client’s Fee/Costs Recovery of $688,634 Goes POOF! For Now.      In Fleischman v. Law Office of Paul Stanton, Case No. B216898 (2d Dist., Div. 8 June 12, 2014) (unpublished), which involved nasty conservatorship/elder abuse claims among trust beneficiaries with respect to a deceased trustee, client was able to invalidate a retainer agreement which placed

Family Law: Wife Agreeing To Seek Fees/Costs By Post-Trial Motion Waived Due Process Challenge To What Occurred Before Judgment Reached

Cases: Family Law

  Waiver Was the Result.      In Marriage of Williamson, Case No. B238067 (2d Dist., Div. 6 June 12, 2014) (published), wife—who was awarded $10,000 in fees and costs as against husband—claimed she was denied due process by not being able to present relevant evidence on the issue before judgment was entered.     However, the

In The News: N.D. California District Judge Reverses Bankruptcy Court “Clawback” Decision Relating to Heller Ehrman Bankruptcy and Palmdale Ordered To Pay $3.563 Million In Fees/Costs In Voting Rights Act Violation Case

In The News

  Jewel v. Boxer Found To Be Inapt, With Reasoning Indicating It May No Longer Be Viable California Law.      On February 22, 2014, we reported on a bankruptcy court decision where Heller Ehrman’s Chapter 11 trustee had obtained a successful “clawback” of hourly fee matter proceeds going to third-party firms which took over Heller

In The News . . . . Massachusetts Appellate Court Decides In-House Counsel Work Can Be Recovered In Fee Proceeding And Delaware Senate Bill Pending To Undo Recent ATP Tours Bylaw Decision With Respect To Stock Corporations.

In The News

       Our colleagues at NALFA recently posted on one case and a subsequent development we now share with you. Massachusetts Appellate Court Finds In-House Counsel Fees Are Recoverable.      In Holland v. Jackmann, Mass. App. No. 13-P-0280 (May 14, 2014), an appellate court determined that in-house counsel work could be recoverable as attorney’s fees

Continuing Legal Education: Manatt’s Susan White, Co-Contributor Mike, And Dallas Attorney Charlie Wilson Speak On Attorney’s Fees At June 10, 2014 Rossdale CLE Conference

CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION

  Tips on Insurance and Fee Petitions Presented by All Panelists.      On June 10, 2014, Rossdale CLE—a Florida based CLE provider—hosted an attorney’s fees seminar with Susan White of Los Angeles’ Manatt, co-contributor Mike of Santa Ana’s AlvaradoSmith, and Charles M. “Charlie” Wilson III of Dallas’ Goranson Bain. They each provided a 30 minute

In The News . . . . Halle Berry Ordered To Pay $300,000 In Attorney’s Fees To Ex-Boyfriend Gabriel Aubry For Child Custody Dispute Expenses

Cases: Celebrities, In The News

       Recently, Oscar-winning actress Halle Berry, who probably did not feel very adored, was ordered by a Los Angeles family law judge to pay her ex-boyfriend Gabriel Aubry—pursuant to an agreement between the two sides–$300,000 in attorney’s fees to cover the costs of their child custody dispute. She also was ordered to pay Mr.

Scroll to Top