Author name: Marc Alexander

Equity, Section 1717: Plaintiff Losing Shareholder Derivative Claim Liable For Defense Attorney’s Fees

Cases: Equity, Cases: Section 1717

  Reciprocity Required Under Section 1717, Given Unfairness of Other Result.      In Trejo v. Arriaga, Case No. D064410 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Jan. 21, 2015) (unpublished), plaintiff 50/50 shareholder in a closely-held corporation lost an amended shareholder derivative lawsuit against defendant 50/50 shareholder. Defendant nonsuited plaintiff based on a failure to prove damages. Defendant

Section 1717: Subcontractor Failing To Provide Admissible Proof Of Contract In Fee Proceeding Properly Denied Recovery

Cases: Section 1717

  Big Practice Tip—Make Sure Contractual Predicate Is Provided For Motion In An Evidentiary Sense.      Century Quality Management, Inc. v. JMS Air Conditioning and Appliance Service, Inc., Case No. B255326 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Jan. 21, 2015) (unpublished) is a very good decision offering an important practice tip for a fee claimant—make sure that

In The News . . . . After Two Years Of Cuts, Orange County’s Largest Law Firms Increased Workforces By 3.2% Overall In 2014

In The News

  Increases Followed From Prior Yearly 2% and 1% Cutbacks.      As reported in the January 19-25, 2014 issue of the Orange County Business Journal, Orange County’s largest law firms increased their workforces by 3.2% overall in 2014, reversing prior yearly cutbacks in past years of 2% and 1%, respectively.      Also, this edition has

Sanctions: $9,120 CCP § 128.7 Sanctions Order Against Husband And His Counsel In Civil Action Reversed Because Record Did Not Show Improper Motive

Cases: Sanctions

  Civil Action Was Part of Bitter Dissolution Dispute.      Husband, during the pendency of apparent bitter dissolution proceedings with his former wife, filed multiple civil lawsuits against wife, her parents, and her parents’ trust. Earlier, in one of the actions, the assigned civil judge refused to deem the matter related to the family law

Fee Clause Interpretation: Tort Claims Where Interpretation Of Transaction Agreement Not At Issue Were Not Subject To Fee Recovery

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

  Fee Provision Only Encompassed Narrower Action “To Enforce Or Interpret the Agreement.”      Plaintiff did well in a conversion, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and unfair competition action against defendants, eventually netting him $3.82 million in compensatory damages and $400,000 total punitive defendants against two defendants. He then sought to recover $2.1 million under

Special Fee Shifting Statute: $44,630 Fee Award Against Public Records Act Petitioner/Her Attorney Reversed On Appeal

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  Appellate Court Disagreed With Lower Court, Because PRA Litigation Was Not "Clearly Frivolous" So As To Justify Fee Order.      In Bertoli v. City of Sebastopol, Case No. A132916 (1st Dist., Div. 4 Jan. 20, 2015) (published), a petitioner/her attorney were hit with an adverse $44,630 fee award (out of a requested $82,380) in

Cases Under Review: California Supreme Court Will Hear Two Prevailing Defendant Fee/Costs Cases On February 4, 2015

Cases: Cases Under Review

  Tract 19051 HOA And Williams Matters Set To Be Argued.      On February 4, 2015, the California Supreme Court will hear arguments in two prevailing defendant cases, one involving fee recovery and the second involving routine costs recovery.      In Tract 19051 Homeowners Association v. Kemp, No. S211596, the Court will consider whether a

Judgment Enforcement: Social Security Bank Account, Even If Not Direct Government Deposit, Exempt From Judgment Enforcement Re Fee/Costs Award

Cases: Judgment Enforcement

  Judgment Debtor Must Show Social Security Funds Were Involved, But This Was Done.     Machine signs 7,000 Social Security checks per hour with no writer’s cramp.  1939.  Library of Congress.        Justice Fybel, on behalf of a 3-0 panel, in Kilker v. Stillman, Case No. G048473 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Jan. 16, 2015) (published)

Scroll to Top