Author name: Marc Alexander

Intellectual Property, Reasonableness Of Fees: Copyright Act Does Not Preempt Fee Entitlement Under Broad Contractual Fees Clause

Cases: Intellectual Property, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

  However, District Judge’s Award Of Only 15% of Requested Fees Vacated/Remanded For Another Adjudication On the Issue.      In an issue of first impression, the Ninth Circuit in Ryan v. Editions Limited West, Inc., Nos. 12-17810/13-15061 (9th Cir. May 19, 2015) (published), decided that the Copyright Act of 1976 does not expressly or implicitly

In The News . . . . Norton Rose Fulbright’s May 15, 2015 Litigation Trends Annual Survey Shows Class Action, IP, And Regulatory Matters As Top Issues For Corporate Departments

In The News

  Class Actions Are Top Litigation Issue For U.S., Canada, and Australia Respondents, And Alternative Fee Arrangements Are Frequent.      On May 14, 2015, Norton Rose Fulbright released its “2015 Litigation Trends Annual Survey,” the ll1th one overall and extensively polling more than 800 corporate counsel representing a wide array of companies across 26 countries

Cases Under Review: SCOTUS Grants Certiorari On Whether A FRCP 68 Offer Of Complete Relief Moots Individual’s Claim And Moots Named Plaintiff’s Class Claim Before Certification

Cases: Cases Under Review, Cases: Settlement

  Splits Among Circuit Courts On Both Issues—Ninth Circuit Decision Accepted For Review.      On May 18, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, No. 14-857, a Ninth Circuit decision formerly published at 768 F.3d 871 (9th Cir. 2014). Two issues involving the impact of FRCP 68 offers of complete

In The News . . . . Water Replenishment District of So Cal Stunned By $5 Million Fee Bill In Pumping Rate Case And Recent Study Of 2003-2013 Patent Fee Awards Yields Some Interesting Results

In The News

      We thank our friends at National Association of Legal Fee Analysis (NALFA) for providing us a couple of recent posts of interest, which we summarize below. Big Firm $5 Million Bill In Pumping Rate Case Was A Surprise.     Based on a recent Los Angeles Times story entitled “Water District Found Itself Drowning

Section 998: Lower Court Did Not Err In Failing To Award Expert Witness Fees To Prevailing Plaintiff Because She Did Not Beat Her 998 Offer

Cases: Section 998

  Reason Was That Only Negotiated Medical Expenses Actually Paid By Her Insurer Should Have Been Considered At The Time Of The Offer.      In Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc., 52 Cal.4th 541, 548 (2011), the California Supreme Court decided that a negotiated rate differential included in a jury’s award in a personal

Construction, Indemnity: Fee Denial Against Winning Subcontractor Under Indemnity Clause Reversed, While Reduced Fee Award In Favor Of Other Winning Contractor Affirmed Except For Minor Modification Upward

Cases: Construction, Cases: Indemnity

  Fee Entitlement Was Present, But Reducing Request For Another Party No Abuse Of Discretion.      Esparza v. PulteGroup, Inc. (Centex), Case No. D063736 (4th Dist., Div. 1 May 14, 2015) (unpublished) was a construction defect/personal injury action by several residential homeowners against Centex (which subsequently merged into the PulteGroup), which in turn cross-complained against

Special Fee Shifting Statute, Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: $175,000 Fee Award To Community Services District Defendant Under Brown Act Reversed On Appeal

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes, Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

  Nothing Showed Lawsuit Was Clearly Frivolous and No Billing Records Made Substantiation Possible.      In Kent v. Lake Don Pedro Community Services Dist., Case Nos. F068354/F069197 (5th Dist. May 14, 2015) (unpublished), a third appellate round, plaintiffs challenging Brown Act violations by the District were hit with an adverse fee award of $175,000 under

Family Law: $375,000 Needs Based Fee Award To Fletcher Jones, Jr.’s Ex-Wife Affirmed For Fees To Fight Nevada Proceedings Relating To Prenuptial, Martial, and Post-Marital Settlement Agreements

Cases: Family Law

  She Had Previously Been Awarded $3.127 Million In Fees.     This next case, authored by Justice Moore on behalf of a 3-0 panel, involves Nevada divorce proceedings relating to prenuptial, marital, and post-marital settlement agreements between Fletcher Jones, Jr. and his ex-wife Kimberly.  After Fletcher had previously paid about $3.127 million of her divorce

Scroll to Top